Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

Kernel Bug in SME 5.6

JUL

Kernel Bug in SME 5.6
« on: March 05, 2003, 07:51:43 PM »
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: Code: 39 70 04 75 0e 51 53 57 50 e8 d2 02 00 00 83 c4 10 eb 08 89
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel:  ------------[ cut here ]------------
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:131!
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: invalid operand: 0000
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: printer usb-uhci usbcore 3c59x ide-scsi ide-cd cdrom scsi_mod ext3 jbd  
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: CPU:    0
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: EIP:    0010:[__free_pages_ok+282/784]    Not tainted
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: EIP:    0010:[]    Not tainted
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: EFLAGS: 00010286
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel:
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: EIP is at __free_pages_ok [kernel] 0x11a (2.4.18-5)
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: eax: 00000020   ebx: c120e0d0   ecx: 00000001   edx: 000023a4
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: esi: 00000000   edi: c1000030   ebp: 00000000   esp: c9689e84
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: Process sh (pid: 1910, stackpage=c9689000)
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: Stack: c02251dc 00000083 c120ea00 c120e990 c120e0d0 c9e2fff0 c013611e c9738438
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel:        c9739a38 00005000 c9e2fff0 00001000 0964c065 c0124ebf c120e0d0 00000002
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel:        00000000 c0000000 c968abfc bfffb000 00000000 c0000000 c968abfc c9f2c6e4
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: Call Trace: [page_remove_rmap+158/192] page_remove_rmap [kernel] 0x9e
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: Call Trace: [] page_remove_rmap [kernel] 0x9e
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [do_zap_page_range+399/592] do_zap_page_range [kernel] 0x18f
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [] do_zap_page_range [kernel] 0x18f
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [handle_signal+125/256] handle_signal [kernel] 0x7d
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [] handle_signal [kernel] 0x7d
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [zap_page_range+80/128] zap_page_range [kernel] 0x50
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [] zap_page_range [kernel] 0x50
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [exit_mmap+202/320] exit_mmap [kernel] 0xca
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [] exit_mmap [kernel] 0xca
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [mmput+38/80] mmput [kernel] 0x26
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [] mmput [kernel] 0x26
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [do_exit+179/576] do_exit [kernel] 0xb3
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [] do_exit [kernel] 0xb3
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [sys_sigreturn+185/240] sys_sigreturn [kernel] 0xb9
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [] sys_sigreturn [kernel] 0xb9
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [system_call+51/56] system_call [kernel] 0x33
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: [] system_call [kernel] 0x33
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel:
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel:
Mar  5 17:29:01 sme kernel: Code: 0f 0b 5f 5d c6 43 24 05 8b 43 18 89 f1 89 dd 83 e0 eb 89 43

Is there a fix/patch/solution for this problem ?

Take care.

JUL

Dan Brown

Re: Kernel Bug in SME 5.6
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2003, 08:05:46 PM »
Sounds like something that should be reported to bugs@e-smith.com.

JUL

Re: Kernel Bug in SME 5.6
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2003, 08:28:21 PM »
done.

Thx

estad

Re: Kernel Bug in SME 5.6
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2003, 08:57:32 PM »
If have the same problem. Please update this thread, if you find a solution/workaround.

TIA,

/Henrik

Ray Mitchell

Re: Kernel Bug in SME 5.6
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2003, 07:13:55 AM »
Dear All
I believe I experienced the same/similar problem, see my post a few days ago at
http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=16723.msg64736#msg64736

which is quoted below:

I have a working v5.6 server acting as domain controller which has been running OK for a few weeks.One moring Windows workstations could not log on, received message no domain server available. I tried logging on to the console but no response from the server, which then required a forced reboot. After restarting, the server worked correctly and users culd log on normally. The system had been working OK about 11.30 pm the previous evening. The only apparently unusual entry in /var/log/messages is the following.

Can anyone tell me what it means and if it is related to the server "malfunction" ??

Thanks
Ray Mitchell

Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: printing eip:
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: c01c938c
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: *pde = 00000000
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: Oops: 0000
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: ppp_deflate zlib_deflate ppp_async printer usbcore appletalk slip ppp_generic
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: CPU: 0
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: EIP: 0010:[datagram_poll+188/208] Tainted: P
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: EIP: 0010:[] Tainted: P
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel:
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: EIP is at datagram_poll [kernel] 0xbc (2.4.18-5)
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: eax: 00000000 ebx: c0dbf8e0 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000000
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: esi: 00000049 edi: 00000000 ebp: 00000145 esp: c1927f04
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: Process atalkd (pid: 2026, stackpage=c1927000)
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: Stack: 0000000a c011f854 c1927f30 c11f0a80 00000000 c2fbb1c0 c01c3e1f c2fbb1c0
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: c24c57a4 00000000 c0146a4c c2fbb1c0 00000000 c1927f54 00000100 c1926000
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: 7fffffff 00000008 00000000 0000000a 00000000 c1dd0000 00000001 bffffc14
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: Call Trace: [schedule_timeout+20/160] schedule_timeout [kernel] 0x14
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: Call Trace: [] schedule_timeout [kernel] 0x14
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: [sock_poll+31/48] sock_poll [kernel] 0x1f
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: [] sock_poll [kernel] 0x1f
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: [do_select+268/576] do_select [kernel] 0x10c
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: [] do_select [kernel] 0x10c
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: [sys_select+825/1168] sys_select [kernel] 0x339
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: [] sys_select [kernel] 0x339
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: [system_call+51/64] system_call [kernel] 0x33
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: [] system_call [kernel] 0x33
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel:
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel:
Mar 3 03:31:17 server1 kernel: Code: 0f ab 48 04 89 f0 83 c4 10 5b 5e c3 90 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00

Ray Mitchell

Re: Kernel Bug in SME 5.6
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2003, 09:11:16 AM »
For the benefit of anyone reading this thread.

After a bit of dialogue with Mitel (Thanks very much to them), where they suggested the problem was failing hardware, I initially added more RAM but still had the problem.

I then removed the original RAM and now only have the additional RAM (64Mb) and now I have no more problem.
So most probably the original RAM was faulty.

Hope this helps someone.

Regards
Ray Mitchell

olby

Re: Kernel Bug in SME 5.6
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2003, 11:22:51 PM »
I've had this event on my server:
httpd: PHP Fatal error:  Allowed memory size of 12582912 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 3042608 bytes) in /home/e-smith/files/primary/html/phpmyadmin/read_dump.php on line 113
before the above mentioned errors (or something like them / another printer).

This indicates that it might by memory initiated.

System reboot says that my 512 Mb memory is OK.
Is there a better way to determine memory errors in linux?

Ray Mitchell

Re: Kernel Bug in SME 5.6
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2003, 09:31:37 AM »
Try testing with Charlie Bradys memory tester,
ftp://ftp.e-smith.org/pub/e-smith/contrib/CharlieBrady/memtest/
search dev-info list for some brief instructions a month or two ago, oops dev-info list is still down so here is the info
Ray

http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org/msg11704.html
[e-smith-devinfo] [Announce] background memory tester
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Charlie Brady
Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] [Announce] background memory tester
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:50:30 -0800
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Problem: you suspect the RAM in your server, or you wish to stress the
system a little and see that it is still reliable

Answer: install my background memory tester!

# F=ftp://ftp.e-smith.org/pub/e-smith/contrib/CharlieBrady/memtest
# rpm -Uhv $F/e-smith-memtest-0.0.1-04.noarch.rpm  \
    $Fmemtester-2.93.1-01.i386.rpm
# /sbin/e-smith/config set memtest service status enabled
# svc-start memtest

Logs will be found in /var/log/memtest

Do:

# svc-stop memtest
# /sbin/e-smith/config set memtest service status disabled

to stop testing

Problem reports (or gifts :-)) direct to me please.

--
Charlie Brady                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead Product Developer

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Charlie Brady wrote:
> Answer: install my background memory tester!
It's been pointed out that I've made a significant oversight here.  Quite
right. Credit for the memory tester rightly goes to Simon Kirby and
Charles Cazabon. *They* developed the memory tester. More details here.

http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/software/memtester/

All I've done is do the packaging and put together the execution
environment (which uses Dan Bernstein's fine tools).

> # F=ftp://ftp.e-smith.org/pub/e-smith/contrib/CharlieBrady/memtest
> # rpm -Uhv $F/e-smith-memtest-0.0.1-04.noarch.rpm  \
>     $Fmemtester-2.93.1-01.i386.rpm

There's a typo there. This is the correct command:

# F=ftp://ftp.e-smith.org/pub/e-smith/contrib/CharlieBrady/memtest
# rpm -Uhv $F/e-smith-memtest-0.0.1-04.noarch.rpm  \
    $F/memtester-2.93.1-01.i386.rpm

> Problem reports (or gifts :-)) direct to me please.

Remember Simon and Charles in your Christmas wishes also :-)
Problem reports still to me (only) please.

--
Charlie Brady                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead Product Developer
Network Server Solutions Group


From: Adam Sleight
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: [Announce] background memory tester
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:30:35 -0800
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How does this compare to http://www.memtest86.com/ ?

On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:46:37 -0500 (EST)
 Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Credit for the memory tester rightly goes to Simon
> Kirby and
> Charles Cazabon. *They* developed the memory tester. More
> details here.
>
> http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/software/memtester/


On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Adam Sleight wrote:

> How does this compare to http://www.memtest86.com/ ?

A little reading at the web site you mention should tell you. memtest86
runs instead of the operating system. memtester runs as a process within
the OS.

--
Charlie Brady

JUL

[LONG] Re: Kernel Bug in SME 5.6
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2003, 04:03:53 PM »
I do a MemTest on my SME 5.5 box because the 5.6 doesn't work for me... as u can see in this thread.

The result is :

[...]

@400000003f167f5f2994a934 Unable to malloc 339738624 bytes.
@400000003f167f5f2994e7b4 Unable to malloc 338690048 bytes.
@400000003f167f5f29952634 Unable to malloc 337641472 bytes.
@400000003f167f5f299564b4 Unable to malloc 336592896 bytes.
@400000003f167f5f2995a334 Unable to malloc 335544320 bytes.

[...]

@400000003f167f5f299600f4 Allocated 334495744 bytes...trying mlock...failed:  insufficient resources.
@400000003f167f5f2996d7cc Allocated 333443072 bytes...trying mlock...failed:  insufficient resources.
@400000003f167f5f299754cc Allocated 332390400 bytes...trying mlock...failed:  insufficient resources.
@400000003f167f5f2997cde4 Allocated 331337728 bytes...trying mlock...failed:  insufficient resources.
@400000003f167f5f29984ae4 Allocated 330285056 bytes...trying mlock...failed:  insufficient resources.

[...]

@400000003f167f5f29efc954 Allocated 134488064 bytes...trying mlock...failed:  insufficient resources.
@400000003f167f5f29f03a9c Allocated 133435392 bytes...trying mlock...success.  Starting tests...
@400000003f167f8112bd9d74
@400000003f167f8112be1e5c Testing 133431296 bytes at 0x40301000 (4088 bytes lost to page alignment).
@400000003f167f8112be2a14
@400000003f167f8112bec26c Run    1:
@400000003f167f8112bf0ca4   Test  1:         Stuck Address:  Testing...Passed.
@400000003f167fa91f4db5c4   Test  2:          Random value:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f167fac1845767c FAILURE: 0xe77af1d3 != 0xef7af1d3 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fac1845dc0c Skipping to next test...
@400000003f167fac1846225c   Test  3:        XOR comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f167fad34da2c9c   Test  4:        SUB comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f167faf15d10794   Test  5:        MUL comparison:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f167fb016800c44 FAILURE: 0x627b9bd0 != 0x6a7b9bd0 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fb016806dec Skipping to next test...
@400000003f167fb01680b054   Test  6:        DIV comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f167fb22e0303bc   Test  7:         OR comparison:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f167fb32c8a1b74 FAILURE: 0xf7ff8b8c != 0xffff8b8c at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fb32c8a7d1c Skipping to next test...
@400000003f167fb32c8abf84   Test  8:        AND comparison:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f167fb42b0ff2dc FAILURE: 0x72bf8300 != 0x7abf8300 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fb42b10586c Skipping to next test...
@400000003f167fb42b10a2a4   Test  9:  Sequential Increment:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f167fb5385a52ac   Test 10:            Solid Bits:  Testing...   2
@400000003f167fb9051e3bec FAILURE: 0xf7ffffff != 0xffffffff at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fb9051ea564 Skipping to next test...

[...]

@400000003f16800c05eb82b4   Test  1:         Stuck Address:  Testing...  15
@400000003f16802403bb4ca4 FAILURE: possible bad address line at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16802403bb873c Skipping to next test...
@400000003f16802403bbc9a4   Test  2:          Random value:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f16802637eff81c FAILURE: 0xb5e70bb5 != 0xbde70bb5 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16802637f05dac Skipping to next test...
@400000003f16802637f0a7e4   Test  3:        XOR comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f1680281b09e1f4   Test  4:        SUB comparison:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f168029199ae4bc FAILURE: 0xd059c115 != 0xd859c115 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f168029199b4664 Skipping to next test...
@400000003f168029199bbb94   Test  5:        MUL comparison:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f16802a1855ce14 FAILURE: 0x91bdaed4 != 0xb1bdaed4 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16802a18562fbc Skipping to next test...
@400000003f16802a18567224   Test  6:        DIV comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f16802c2fd650a4   Test  7:         OR comparison:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f16802d2e982f3c FAILURE: 0xf7dfccef != 0xffdfccef at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16802d2e9898b4 Skipping to next test...
@400000003f16802d2e98df04   Test  8:        AND comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f16802f0f92deac   Test  9:  Sequential Increment:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f16802f39f9e17c FAILURE: 0x67e8a911 != 0x6fe8a911 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16802f39fa4324 Skipping to next test...
@400000003f16802f39fa8974   Test 10:            Solid Bits:  Testing...   0
@400000003f16803028b9e934 FAILURE: 0xf7ffffff != 0xffffffff at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16803028ba52ac Skipping to next test...
@400000003f16803028ba98fc   Test 11:      Block Sequential:  Testing...   8
@400000003f16803b0917b0ac FAILURE: 0x00080808 != 0x08080808 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16803b0917e75c Skipping to next test...
@400000003f16803b091829c4   Test 12:          Checkerboard:  Testing...   1
@400000003f16803d04e83bb4 FAILURE: 0xa2aaaaaa != 0xaaaaaaaa at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16803d04e8a144 Skipping to next test...
@400000003f16803d04e8e794   Test 13:            Bit Spread:  Testing...  25
@400000003f16805e0e4d3b64 FAILURE: 0x02000000 != 0x0a000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16805e0e4d9924 Skipping to next test...
@400000003f16805e0e4ddf74   Test 14:              Bit Flip:  Testing...   2
@400000003f1680611732ca14 FAILURE: 0xf7fffffe != 0xfffffffe at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16806117335e84 Skipping to next test...
@400000003f1680611733a4d4   Test 15:          Walking Ones:  Testing...  27
@400000003f168083042ef604 FAILURE: 0x00000000 != 0x08000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f168083042f5b94 Skipping to next test...
@400000003f168083042f9dfc   Test 16:        Walking Zeroes:  Testing...   0
@400000003f1680832f6faf34 FAILURE: 0xf7fffffe != 0xfffffffe at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680832f7014c4 Skipping to next test...
@400000003f1680832f705efc Run    2 completed in 119 seconds (13 tests showed errors).
@400000003f1680832f708ddc Run    3:
@400000003f1680832f70c874   Test  1:         Stuck Address:  Testing...Passed.
@400000003f1680a216b0efe4   Test  2:          Random value:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f1680a50f95efd4 FAILURE: 0x75ce2498 != 0x7dce2498 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680a50f965564 Skipping to next test...
@400000003f1680a50f9697cc   Test  3:        XOR comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f1680a62c2c8284   Test  4:        SUB comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f1680a80d250f14   Test  5:        MUL comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f1680a929f02714   Test  6:        DIV comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f1680ac05f542cc   Test  7:         OR comparison:  Setting...Testing...
@400000003f1680ad04831cfc FAILURE: 0xd6efb836 != 0xdeefb836 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680ad0483828c Skipping to next test...
@400000003f1680ad0483ccc4   Test  8:        AND comparison:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f1680ae211ee3b4   Test  9:  Sequential Increment:  Setting...Testing...Passed.
@400000003f1680af31008094   Test 10:            Solid Bits:  Testing...   0
@400000003f1680b01fbede84 FAILURE: 0xf7ffffff != 0xffffffff at offset 0x002998ee.

[...]

In fact :

[root@sme root]# cat /var/log/memtest/current | grep completed
@400000003f16800c05eb1554 Run    1 completed in 139 seconds (11 tests showed errors).
@400000003f1680832f705efc Run    2 completed in 119 seconds (13 tests showed errors).
@400000003f16810110cfbfc4 Run    3 completed in 126 seconds (9 tests showed errors).
@400000003f16817a1e527574 Run    4 completed in 121 seconds (14 tests showed errors).
@400000003f1681f63047d724 Run    5 completed in 124 seconds (13 tests showed errors).

and :

[root@sme root]# cat /var/log/memtest/current | grep FAILURE
@400000003f167fac1845767c FAILURE: 0xe77af1d3 != 0xef7af1d3 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fb016800c44 FAILURE: 0x627b9bd0 != 0x6a7b9bd0 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fb32c8a1b74 FAILURE: 0xf7ff8b8c != 0xffff8b8c at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fb42b0ff2dc FAILURE: 0x72bf8300 != 0x7abf8300 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fb9051e3bec FAILURE: 0xf7ffffff != 0xffffffff at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fc320fd6964 FAILURE: 0x00080808 != 0x08080808 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fc51cc9414c FAILURE: 0xa2aaaaaa != 0xaaaaaaaa at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fe6219b4774 FAILURE: 0x02000000 != 0x0a000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f167fe92a2c4d84 FAILURE: 0xf7fffffe != 0xfffffffe at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16800b1649297c FAILURE: 0x00000000 != 0x08000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16800c05ea0bb4 FAILURE: 0xf7fffffe != 0xfffffffe at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16802403bb4ca4 FAILURE: possible bad address line at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16802637eff81c FAILURE: 0xb5e70bb5 != 0xbde70bb5 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f168029199ae4bc FAILURE: 0xd059c115 != 0xd859c115 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16802a1855ce14 FAILURE: 0x91bdaed4 != 0xb1bdaed4 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16802d2e982f3c FAILURE: 0xf7dfccef != 0xffdfccef at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16802f39f9e17c FAILURE: 0x67e8a911 != 0x6fe8a911 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16803028b9e934 FAILURE: 0xf7ffffff != 0xffffffff at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16803b0917b0ac FAILURE: 0x00080808 != 0x08080808 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16803d04e83bb4 FAILURE: 0xa2aaaaaa != 0xaaaaaaaa at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16805e0e4d3b64 FAILURE: 0x02000000 != 0x0a000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680611732ca14 FAILURE: 0xf7fffffe != 0xfffffffe at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f168083042ef604 FAILURE: 0x00000000 != 0x08000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680832f6faf34 FAILURE: 0xf7fffffe != 0xfffffffe at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680a50f95efd4 FAILURE: 0x75ce2498 != 0x7dce2498 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680ad04831cfc FAILURE: 0xd6efb836 != 0xdeefb836 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680b01fbede84 FAILURE: 0xf7ffffff != 0xffffffff at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680bb03b0d4f4 FAILURE: 0x00080808 != 0x08080808 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680bc3ad64b44 FAILURE: 0xa2aaaaaa != 0xaaaaaaaa at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680de0a88ec1c FAILURE: 0x02000000 != 0x0a000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1680de34e26de4 FAILURE: 0xf7fffffe != 0xfffffffe at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16810021319cac FAILURE: 0x00000000 != 0x08000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16810110cf13e4 FAILURE: 0xf7fffffe != 0xfffffffe at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16811c252ee1fc FAILURE: 0xc723103b != 0xcf23103b at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16811d23fb6ef4 FAILURE: 0xe4f52934 != 0xecf52934 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16811e228355b4 FAILURE: 0x71098988 != 0x81098988 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16811f234cc034 FAILURE: 0x83070ff8 != 0x73070ff8 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681211cbbfec4 FAILURE: 0x00000003 != 0x00000002 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681221b5327c4 FAILURE: 0x35edc56f != 0x3dedc56f at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16812426b51c6c FAILURE: 0xd7991f89 != 0xdf991f89 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681251571d864 FAILURE: 0xf7ffffff != 0xffffffff at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16812f334f3b24 FAILURE: 0x00080808 != 0x08080808 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681312f8c62dc FAILURE: 0xa2aaaaaa != 0xaaaaaaaa at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681532a85a884 FAILURE: 0x02000000 != 0x0a000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681563472faa4 FAILURE: 0xf7fffffe != 0xfffffffe at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16817820f6d9b4 FAILURE: 0x00000000 != 0x08000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16817a1e51c994 FAILURE: 0xf7fffffd != 0xfffffffd at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f168195324fefac FAILURE: 0x137f5d85 != 0x1b7f5d85 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16819630d8cc84 FAILURE: 0x64847779 != 0x6c847779 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681972f5ff7c4 FAILURE: 0xe4cd365c != 0xeccd365c at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681983032b8e4 FAILURE: 0x36d08218 != 0x8ed08218 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16819a2a374a04 FAILURE: 0x00000000 != 0x00000002 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16819b28bfe08c FAILURE: 0x35fd2b72 != 0x3dfd2b72 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16819f054f0c04 FAILURE: 0xf7ffffff != 0xffffffff at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681a921a2486c FAILURE: 0x00080808 != 0x08080808 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681ab1d2e9e84 FAILURE: 0xa2aaaaaa != 0xaaaaaaaa at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681d022d390c4 FAILURE: 0x02000000 != 0x0a000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681d234fd9aec FAILURE: 0x00000001 != 0x00ff0001 at offset 0x00c44350.
@400000003f1681f42b038efc FAILURE: 0x00000000 != 0x08000000 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1681f630472f2c FAILURE: 0xf7fffffd != 0xfffffffd at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16820e1fb1c6f4 FAILURE: possible bad address line at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1682111855743c FAILURE: 0xef49361c != 0xe749361c at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16821217bc2a0c FAILURE: 0x73bf5826 != 0x7bbf5826 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16821318853e9c FAILURE: 0x742d7798 != 0x7c2d7798 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f168214172112ec FAILURE: 0x259e8800 != 0x2d9e8800 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1682172ec9033c FAILURE: 0x55eb780b != 0x5deb780b at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f16821b0b5786bc FAILURE: 0xf7ffffff != 0xffffffff at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f168225260cf1a4 FAILURE: 0x00080808 != 0x08080808 at offset 0x002998ee.
@400000003f1682272198cabc FAILURE: 0xa2aaaaaa != 0xaaaaaaaa at offset 0x002998ee.

My purpose is to know if this test is really represantative of the reality... and how do you interpret the results ?

I think that my Ram Memory is broken... but I'm not sure...

Any idea ?

Thx in advance.

Charlie Brady

Memory problem (was Re: [LONG] Re: Kernel Bug in SME 5.6)
« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2003, 01:54:35 AM »
JUL wrote:
 
> I do a MemTest on my SME 5.5 box because the 5.6 doesn't work
> for me... as u can see in this thread.
...
> I think that my Ram Memory is broken... but I'm not sure...

I think it's reasonable to assume that if your system is malfunctioning, and a memory test fails, that you do in fact have a RAM problem.

Charlie