I didn't find much relevant here via search, so I'll pose the question:
Would it be safe to upgrade the core qmail package with patches from the likes of:
netqmail -
http://qmail.coastalwave.net/netqmail/qmailtoaster -
http://www.qmailtoaster.com/qmailrocks -
http://qmailrocks.org/netqmail is probably the least invasive in terms of adding a bunch of extra junk. It is just the "approved" patches to qmail 1.03 (Peter Samuel is part of the netqmail effort.)
Qmail Toaster... I dunno. Might be a little overboard for SME. But the core set of qmail patches might be useful as they go further than netqmail.
Ditto that for Qmail Rocks.
Based on the available patches I'm seeing, and their "critical" labeling by djb and others in the know, it seems as if SME should have applied some of these patches previously. (Understanding the qmail license, I can see how this might be too much trouble, though.)
However, that said, I have been handed the following requirements to add to SME in short order (end of February deadline):
-- support SMTP with TLS + AUTH (for both inbound and outbound traffic)
-- collect POP3 and IMAP over SSL (I think fetchmail handles this one nicely already, but will require some template tweaking to integrate properly)
-- SMTP over SSL
-- Spam and virus scanning of both inbound and outbound messages
Not being an email guru and especially not a qmail guru, I am hoping to garner some pointers as to "you need this patch and that patch and set it up this way".
Thanks
Scott