Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

[SOLVED]How do I find out if both processors are being used?

icpix

[SOLVED]How do I find out if both processors are being used?
« Reply #15 on: September 20, 2006, 12:15:15 AM »
byte/tib----

Production box is a separate SME6 (ie this comms channel!).

I have SME7 on hold in the boot showing the white penguin.
There are FOUR options: two for CentOS and two for SME Server...
CentOS 2.6.9-34.0.2 EL
CentOS 2.6.9-34.0.2 ELsmp
SME Server 2.6.9-34.EL
SME Server 2.6.9-34.ELsmp
...and I think I am currently 'running' in the first option.
Whereas I should be the last option? SME Server smp?



[postedit: I typed up the order slightly wrong... see later posting]




Think I know (more) what happened when things went wrong.
It could have been as we have discussed... but also the site's
one monitor and keyboard could have been on the SME6
which has old-age problems (I built it 10yrs ago!) and the
SME7 YUM reboot might have gone through blind (no monitor)
tap tap etc...
hence the 1st option?
hence CentOS non-smp?
...maybe.

Incoming utility power is dipping already.
A storm is coming... it's now after 11pm - could be a long night;~)

----best wishes, Robert

Offline byte

  • *
  • 2,183
  • +2/-0
[SOLVED]How do I find out if both processors are being used?
« Reply #16 on: September 20, 2006, 12:27:28 AM »
Quote from: "icpix"
.
There are FOUR options: two for CentOS and two for SME Server...
CentOS 2.6.9-34.0.2 EL
CentOS 2.6.9-34.0.2 ELsmp
SME Server 2.6.9-34.EL
SME Server 2.6.9-34.ELsmp
...and I think I am currently 'running' in the first option.
Whereas I should be the last option? SME Server smp?


You are actually running the third option "SME Server 2.6.9-34.EL" and yes you will need the last option "SME Server 2.6.9-34.ELsmp"

Quote

Think I know (more) what happened when things went wrong.
It could have been as we have discussed... but also the site's
one monitor and keyboard could have been on the SME6
which has old-age problems (I built it 10yrs ago!) and the
SME7 YUM reboot might have gone through blind (no monitor)
tap tap etc...
hence the 1st option?
hence CentOS non-smp?
...maybe.


Have you reported to the bug tracker? or checked the bug tracker as I know a recent kernel update has been sent out via updates.
--[byte]--

Have you filled in a Bug Report over @ http://bugs.contribs.org ? Please don't wait to be told this way you help us to help you/others - Thanks!

icpix

[SOLVED]
« Reply #17 on: September 20, 2006, 12:46:23 AM »
byte----

Typed up in the right order (as displayed on the monitor)
There are FOUR options: two for CentOS and two for SME Server...
CentOS 2.6.9-34.0.2 EL
CentOS 2.6.9-34.0.2 ELsmp
SME Server 2.6.9-34.ELsmp
SME Server 2.6.9-34.EL

I believe I was in the CentOS non-smp option.
Have now selected the actual third option...
SME Server 2.6.9-34.ELsmp
...notice it does not have the -0.2 that my snippets showed earlier.

htop - shows CPU1 and CPU2 figures ;~))
sysmon - shows CPU1 and CPU2 graphs ;~))
dmesg - first line shows smp ;~))
Code: [Select]

[root@teri /]# uname -a
Linux teri 2.6.9-34.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Mar 8 00:27:03 CST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@teri /]#

Code: [Select]
[root@teri /]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 4
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz
stepping        : 3
cpu MHz         : 3402.234
cache size      : 2048 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 5
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est cid xtpr
bogomips        : 6806.77

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 4
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz
stepping        : 3
cpu MHz         : 3402.234
cache size      : 2048 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 5
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est cid xtpr
bogomips        : 6799.37

[root@teri /]#


Thanks to you all
we're 'cooking on gas'...
it's a strange/English TV advert
...as opposed to cooking a CPU by overheating it.

I will amend the thread's title to include [SOLVED];~)

----best wishes, Robert

Offline mercyh

  • *
  • 824
  • +0/-0
    • http://mercyh.org
[SOLVED]How do I find out if both processors are being used?
« Reply #18 on: September 27, 2006, 04:36:31 PM »
For anyone researching this topic

See additional thread here:

http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=33825.0

and bug report here:

http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1930


Royce Holdeman