Topic: Problems after installing dungog-getmail

[Rien]

Hi all,

I had installed dungog-multipop, dungog-email and dungog-domain. I installed dungog-getmail because it should be better.

It wasn't working for me because I couldn't retrieve mail what so ever.

So I remove dungog-getmail, but I still wasn't able to fetch mail at all.

Then I removed fetchmail and reïnstalled it again.

Mail is retrieving from my primairy account and from my 2 extra pop3 boxes (for my 2 virtual domains)  and I can see them in Thunderbird, but.....

Althoug the mail is delivered, SME-server send the follouwinga mail back:

Code: [Select]

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at focus.demon.nl.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<maillog@mlkserver.focus.demon.nl>:
Recipient unknown

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <rien.kok@gmail.com>
Received: (qmail 11327 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2006 13:40:15 -0000
Delivered-To: alias-localdelivery-maillog@focus.demon.nl
Received: (qmail 11323 invoked by uid 453); 3 Dec 2006 13:40:15 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0
       tests=HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LENGTH,SPF_NEUTRAL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By: focus.demon.nl
Received: from localhost (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1)
   by focus.demon.nl (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 14:40:08 +0100
Received: from pop3.demon.nl
       by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
       for admin@focus.demon.nl (multi-drop); Sun, 03 Dec 2006 14:40:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from store-22.mail.nl.demon.net by mailstore for admin@focus.demon.nl
       id 1GqrVu-000EoT-7W-000Eob; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 13:36:14 +0000
Received: from [194.159.73.165] (port=49299 helo=incoming-25.mail.nl.demon.net)
       by store-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
       id 1GqrVu-000EoT-7W
       for admin@focus.demon.nl; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 13:36:14 +0000
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.225]:21911 helo=nz-out-0102.google.com)
       by incoming-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
       id 1GqrVu-000GNj-5F
       for admin@focus.demon.nl; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 13:36:14 +0000
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id q3so1359262nzb
       for <admin@focus.demon.nl>; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 05:36:13 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
       s=beta; d=gmail.com;
       h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
       b=R1zKw8N86nj0gX4r+hHHGgr4dMug66+L5UMra7J4CVhGP4/DHXNYnGb5BqqsaOEzRuc4kdI5sWZh4bpKptjh2HnimJom14t/dY5xVunMxYMKdrhK5IBHOmjnZdDig1EznNHnLY6J9khWA+TdU+S6HIFCUiM0di1l+O5XKvOqJuo=
Received: by 10.64.184.14 with SMTP id h14mr10155531qbf.1165152973105;
       Sun, 03 Dec 2006 05:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.203.13 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 05:36:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <cae8fc6a0612030536v6347dcb5xbb99ea85209cd0b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:36:13 +0100
From: "Rien Kok" <rien.kok@gmail.com>
To: rien@taurix.nl, rien@mlkok.nl, "Rien Kok" <rien@focus.demon.nl>,
       Admin <admin@focus.demon.nl>
Subject: zondag2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
       boundary="----=_Part_13113_24104186.1165152973066"
X-Copied-To: maillog

------=_Part_13113_24104186.1165152973066
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

How can I fix this problem?

Thanks,

[cactus]

To me it seems that the admin user is forwarded locally to the maillog user. Doe sthe maillog user exist? You failure message suggests that it does not.

[CharlieBrady]

I had installed dungog-multipop, dungog-email and dungog-domain. I installed dungog-getmail because it should be better.

It wasn't working for me because I couldn't retrieve mail what so ever.

Please report all problems with contribs via the Bug Tracker.

Mail is retrieving from my primairy account and from my 2 extra pop3 boxes (for my 2 virtual domains)  and I can see them in Thunderbird, but.....

Althoug the mail is delivered, SME-server send the follouwinga mail back:

Code: [Select]

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at focus.demon.nl.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<maillog@mlkserver.focus.demon.nl>:
Recipient unknown


How can I fix this problem?

Either disable the Bcc feature of qpsmtpd, or create the maillog user which you have told qpsmtpd to deliver copies of all mail to.

BTW, did "Recipient unknown" not mean anything to you?

[Rien]

I didn't report this problem via the Bug Tracker, because I don't think it was a bug. I saw it as a stupid action of me not knowing what I was doing.

"Recipient unknown" do mean something to me but all mail was delivered correctly in the proper mailboxes. So obviously the recipiants where "known".

I never enabled the "bcc" function, I even don't kow how to do that. So I think that it is done during the installation of getmail. I also don't know how I can disable this function.

Can you tell me how to I can disable the bcc function or how I can create a maillog user?

[CharlieBrady]

I never enabled the "bcc" function, I even don't kow how to do that. So I think that it is done during the installation of getmail.

In that case, it would be a bug with the contrib. Please report it as a bug. It should all "just work". And it should prevent you from doing anything which doesn't work.

[Rien]

Hi,

I reported it as a Bug.

Do you know how to disable the bcc feature?

[byte]

I reported it as a Bug.

Can you put the bug number in case anyone else has this problem?

Do you know how to disable the bcc feature?

config setprop qpsmtpd Bcc disabled
signal-event email-update

[Rien]

Hi,

The bugnumber is 2142

Thanks,

[meanpenguin]

Summary of programs

SME7 versions are listed here. Generally smeserver-* are GPL, dungog-* are commercial

Why are we supporting commerical contribs here?   Should it not be redirected to the vendor?

ed

[Franco]

Why are we supporting commerical contribs here?   Should it not be redirected to the vendor?
ed

That's exactly what happens when you assign a bug, it goes to the vendor.