Thanks for the link. I have found postings on the net making the opposite claim, but testing has proven it true that "net use" is not an appropriate avenue. The suggestion in the page to access the VPN first is interesting. In my case, using a third party tool will be resisted by the end users network support teams.
I did learn some things in the past week. First, the implementation of webDAV in Windows, aka Web Folders, is incomplete in my estimation. It appears that the volume is not mounted in the typical sense. Rather, Windows "shortcuts" are created for each action. That is, when you log on to the volume a "shortcut" file is written to disk. When the volume is "opened" by the user, the "shortcut" is used to get the list of content. When the user double clicks on an item in the list, another "shortcut" is written to the local drive and used for file operations.
The volume and file "shortcuts" are not readily available to the applications using standard operating system file utilities. That they appear on the user's desktop is merely GUI make-believe. Application developers are required to implement the webDAV protocol themselves. IMO, this is a lame design compared to other implementations where the webDAV volume is mounted in the typical sense and the file operations are handled in the o.s.
To create a link to the webDAV shared volume on Windows, one must use the Network Neighborhood "Add a Network Place". However, you must also ensure that the applications in use are webDAV compliant or the end users will have problems. In my solution, the applications have been modified to ignore the Windows file system entirely when webDAV is involved.
I hope this helps someone.