Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

sme server issue

Offline hescominsoon

  • *
  • 14
  • +0/-0
sme server issue
« on: November 20, 2007, 04:35:01 AM »
I already have a hardware raid controller installed(3ware) how can i NOT have sme server install an md raid partition?

Offline jester

  • *
  • 496
  • +1/-0
Re: sme server issue
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2007, 09:21:11 AM »
Have you looked here?!

HTH.

Offline hescominsoon

  • *
  • 14
  • +0/-0
Re: sme server issue
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2007, 01:30:17 PM »
interesting..i don't recall seeing that option.  I'll reinstall and try again.

Offline CharlieBrady

  • *
  • 6,918
  • +3/-0
Re: sme server issue
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2007, 04:31:59 PM »
I already have a hardware raid controller installed(3ware) how can i NOT have sme server install an md raid partition?

Why do you want to avoid the md raid partition? It doesn't hurt you at all.

Offline hescominsoon

  • *
  • 14
  • +0/-0
Re: sme server issue
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2007, 09:43:20 PM »
actually it does when combined with hardware raid..you are doubling the processing that has to be done..first by the cpu and then by the card cpu..no need to take the performance hit.

Offline CharlieBrady

  • *
  • 6,918
  • +3/-0
Re: sme server issue
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2007, 10:00:50 PM »
actually it does when combined with hardware raid..you are doubling the processing that has to be done..

No, that's not true. The linux RAID layer has essentially nothing to do when a RAID1 set is in 'degraded mode', as it is when you have a single disk or an external RAID set.

Offline hescominsoon

  • *
  • 14
  • +0/-0
Re: sme server issue
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2007, 10:50:59 PM »
mdm still sits in the background polling for a recovery...i'm not going to allow that(that's the winders way of doing things honestly)..So i'll retry with the no raid install mode..<G>