RKB
Keep in mind, the more relevant and accurate the info you give, the more and better the help will be given.
My guess is that you may not know how to copy/paste the info requested to your WinXP client to post it here.
Which would make things a lot easier and quicker.
You may want to take some time and learn how to use these tools if you haven't already done so.
If your using WinXP then go here
SFTP and set this up and suggest using notepad+++ if you don't have a favorite editor, the link is on the page.
The three tools are WinSCP, putty and an editor.
You can make a connection to SME's gateway LAN and you will be able to copy/paste SME info to winxp to post here.
When in Server Gateway mode
Router
to
SME Server (External) ethernet card
(requires a static IP assignment from the pre-router 4200 or 834)from
SME Server (Network) ethernet card to Cisco Switch
The rest of the network in also into the Cisco Switch.The last two highlighted can not be on the same subnet.
You will need separate switches or a vlan switch to accomplish that setup.
OR
You can disconnect SME or the router LAN from the Cisco switch, one or the other.
Your choice.
Internet >>> DG834 1| >>> SME (gateway mode) SME Lan >>> Switch1 >>> SME LAN Clients
2| \
hardwired connected via switch and on same subnet
3| /
4| DG834 LAN >>> Switch1 >>> Lan Clients
What you have is SME's internal interface connected thru the Cisco (switch1) to the LAN of the 4200 or DG834 and the subnets are the same.
SpeedStream is obviously using a different default subnet for it's LAN.
That's why one works and one doesn't.
As you can see above, by making those connections to the Cisco (irregardless of the subnet) or (whether it works or not), you will have
circumvented SME's gateway firewall via the DG834 LAN and likewise circumvented the DG834 firewall via SME's LAN.
As well as create a routing issue, possible duplicate responders at the switch cannot respond, thus some routing confusion.
One possible solution...
Internet >>> DG834 1| DMZ >>> (static IP assignment) to SME (gateway mode) SME Lan >>> Switch1 >>> SME LAN Clients
2|
3|
4| DG834 LAN >>> Switch2 >>> Lan Clients
That will work if all is setup correctly.
Switches 1 & 2 can be substituted with a single vlan switch.
This line makes no sense to me as an IP of 60.240.199.106 with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.255 cannot "see" the gateway address of 202.7.162.162.
This setting cannot work without the ISP doing some sort of background magic.
The Gateway address MUST be in the routeable subnet and that is not the case with this statement.
No magic.
Should be...
Static IP = 60.240.199.106
Mask = 255.255.255.255
Gateway server = 60.240.199.1
DNS Server = 202.7.162.162Since the ISP was never reported back for checking, it's just a good WAG and knowing that 202.7.162.162 is a DNS server.

The above info is for the modem/router, not to be used to config SME, except for the DNS Server which may need to be set in SME.
Please report this info....using this manual, which I believe is for your DG834
http://kbserver.netgear.com/pdf/dg834_reference_manual_2.pdfA snapshot of the
Router Status of the DG834 manual page 5-4.
AND
SME
ifconfig results.
Without that info, nobody can effectively help you.
If the Speedstream is truely a router and not a modem set in "bridge" mode I would not use SME as a server gateway. If you have any other forwards on the LAN you will have not end of headaches getting them to work through two router/gateways.
The Speedstream & DG834 are both ADSL routers, modem/router devices.
So bridging is not an option if used for WAN access & routing.
Also with these units it's likely if you bridge them you will loose ADSL+ capability, you'll be ADSL.
If the speedstream is a modem that is not routing (only connecting you to your ISP's WAN router that is in their office), you have the choice of using SME in Server/Gateway mode directly behind the Speedstream or using another routing device and putting the SME in Server only mode on the local LAN.
Doesn't matter if it's routing or not routing, it's dependent on the type of routing....... 1 to many or..... 1 to 1.
Server-only.... 1 to many
or 1 to 1. (1 to many will work, you have to chase the dynamic IP of the server)
Server-Gateway only 1 to 1. (1 to many yields double NAT unlike server-only, no internal gateway)
IOW Server-Gateway mode will NOT work when deployed within the DHCP address pool, whereas (not ideally) Server-only mode will.
However SME will work Server-Gateway mode if you assign a static IP outside the DHCP address pool of the pre-routing.
So either SME modes should be setup 1 to 1 NAT, static IP and also on the DMZ of the router
not the LAN.
Don't know why people on this forum keep telling others to put their server on a LAN.
Maybe you all should do some research and realize why.....no one should ever suggest that to anyone.
The implications of suggesting that can be extremely severe to that individual, under the right conditions.
There's a very few instances where server-only mode is required and strips away many options you may desire to have, that Gateway mode offers.
If you can't switch from server-only mode to gateway mode and everything works as it should, then you have a foobar network setup
or you have cabling or SME NIC problems.
That Simple.
Also the problem with the Speedstream 4200 and DG834 is that they employ "virtual DMZ" not "physical DMZ".
IOW they only have one hardware
internal interface electronics thus the "virtual DMZ" capability.
However they work great for the gamers because, that's what they were designed to be used for.
As for using them with a server, that's an entirely different ball game.
There are ADSL Routers that have daul or multi hardware interfaces within them, however they cost a bit more and are designed to work with
servers.
The other choices are...
1. Use one unit as modem/router and the other bridged as only a router and use it for routing to server.
The bridge router in essence becomes a DMZ router to the server/s
2. Use one modem/router and purchase another plain router and use that for the server.
Both will need some networking expertise as well as #1 device configuration expertise.
Both the 4200 & 834 have hidden configuration screens that you would need to access to make the changes.
So #2 is your better option of the two above.
What your trying to accomplish from what you have depicted so far, requires the following equipment.
1. ADSL+ Router with daul or multi hardware interfaces.
2. two independent switches or a single vlan switch.
Otherwise you will have to make some changes in your network setup.
hth
Happy New Year....
