Topic: SME has Competition ?? ClarkeConnect now = ClearOS

[soprom]

The question was misleading for me in the sense that asking "What makes ClearOS appear to be a more appealing community then SME??" on this forum caugh me by surprise because I don't see this "appealing community" that you do see.

It might be interesting that you explain why you find it more appealing.  Contribs is a strong community and you consider that CLearOS's community is more appealing!? Please elaborate on that because the assertion is not obvious to me.

The look of the UI is better than the server-manager, but this does not define a community.

[electroman00]

The real reason is that we have a small community with little resources.

OK...why?

[Stefano]

OK...why?

because there is a lot of people that use SME without making donation and without helping with bug fixing.. sounds familiar?

ragarding your sign, I repeat: use your time and knowledge helping the community..

[CharlieBrady]

ragarding your sign, I repeat: use your time and knowledge helping the community..

I agree with Stefano. electoman00, either do something about http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 or shut up about it. I don't know what your point is - is it that you are a professional griper? Or do you just do it for fun?

[soprom]

It has not been demonstrated that the ClearOS community is more appealing!

[Bud]

Long live SME and it's Community

I have learned more from you guys about Linux than any other Community.

This Product and This Community Speaks for itself and is simply the BEST there is. PERIOD.
The Rest try to Follow and Copy what's already been done and Being done by the SME Community.

LONG LIVE SME

[electroman00]

Charlie, I'm sorry for making your heart stop and go!!!

Sophie
I can asure you Charlie wasn't making reference to your post.
No need for you to take it to heart, he was refencing my post surely.

hth

[soprom]

I was trying to get low and forget about my stupid reading error... Thanks for bringing this back!!!
By the way, you never said what you liked in the ClearOS's community.  Maybe it's an other of my reading errors...

[CharlieBrady]

I can asure you Charlie wasn't making reference to your post.

Not so. I was responding to Sophie's now-removed post.

hth

We're still waiting for your contribution to bug 139. We'll believe you really are 'hth' when we see it.

[electroman00]

Charlie, I didn't see an issue with her post, however I do have issue with other posts in this thread.

I appears you didn't read my post and comperhend it correctly or you simply didn't read it.

As far as 139, exactly where did I bring it up in this thread, maybe you would be so kind as to point it out.

We're still waiting for your contribution to bug 139.

What contribution would you like me to make.

The bug is there, the solution is there.

What would you like me to do?

[cactus]

As far as 139, exactly where did I bring it up in this thread, maybe you would be so kind as to point it out.

In your signature.

What contribution would you like me to make.

Create patches, work on the required code changes.

The bug is there, the solution is there.

What would you like me to do?

Implement the solution. It is not as evident as it might seem, but that is what should be discussed in the bug report and not here in the forums.

[soprom]

Charlie, I didn't see an issue with her post, however I do have issue with other posts in this thread.

You are using my mistake and I don't like that. 

In answering your recent question, I meant to say that there was no such ClearOS's community compared to SME's... and I printed the opposite.  So Charlie was very right to promptly react to it.

I don't know in English what to call your recent posts in this thread, reusing my words to make your point. But Quebecors have an expression for it... but it would be impolite to print it here.

This thread is not productive at all.

[electroman00]

In your signature.
Create patches, work on the required code changes.
Implement the solution. It is not as evident as it might seem, but that is what should be discussed in the bug report and not here in the forums.

Thank you Cactus.

It's obvious this is already spinning out of control before any of my posts in this thread.
Since I don't frequent the forum much anymore, I wasn't aware things have spun up to this level.
I will therefore take some time to try and understand the issue and will look to a furture response via PM.
This is without a doubt the wrong arena to deal with this issue, I think you would agree.

Thank you again my friend...
Have a good day...
 

[Stefano]

I will therefore take some time to try and understand the issue and will look to a furture response via PM.

you should not write a PM..

if you have something to share with us, use the forums.. if you have code/patches, use bugzilla..
in any other case, please stop.

thank you

[steever]

ebox-platform has put out version 1.4 with some killer features http://trac.ebox-platform.com/wiki/Features.