Topic: Dungog Email filtering/sorting

[James Redfern]

Using (or rather trying to use) Dungog's Procmail, https://www.myhost/user-manager won't start it due to 'HTTP Error 403 - Forbidden ', but https://www.myhost/server-manager works fine.  So nobody can use Procmail.  I say server-manager 'works fine', but although it does what its supposed to, I also get a 'Forbidden - You don't have permission to access /server-manager/cgi-bin/review on this server' on the center panel until click on one of the selections.  Is this somethng easily sorted out with CHMOD or is there a bug someone knows about?

T.

[Terry Brummell]

This sounds almost the same...

http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=5520.msg19469#msg19469

[James Redfern]

Close but no cigar.  I have stacks of users... 8^(

[Terry Brummell]

Try creating a new user and see if it magically starts working...

[James Redfern]

OK, I've done that, and held my breath and counted to ten.  

Now what?

Seriously though, is the an error log somewhere to see?  Is there a way to trace what's (not) happnening?

JR.

Terry Brummell wrote:
>
> Try creating a new user and see if it magically starts
> working...

[James Redfern]

Terry Brummell wrote:
>
> Try creating a new user and see if it magically starts
> working...

Well, this is what's happening but I cannot see why.

[Mon Sep 23 11:01:59 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] client denied by server configuration: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:980/user-manager/
[Mon Sep 23 11:02:04 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] client denied by server configuration: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:980/user-manager/
[Mon Sep 23 11:02:15 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] client denied by server configuration: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:980/user-manager/
[Mon Sep 23 11:02:33 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] client denied by server configuration: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:980/user-manager/
[Mon Sep 23 11:02:39 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] client denied by server configuration: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:980/user-manager/
[Mon Sep 23 11:03:01 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] client denied by server configuration: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:980/user-manager/
[Mon Sep 23 11:03:10 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] client denied by server configuration: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:980/server-manager//cgi-bin/review
[Mon Sep 23 11:05:54 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] client denied by server configuration: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:980/user-manager/
[Mon Sep 23 11:06:04 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] client denied by server configuration: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:980/server-manager//cgi-bin/review

Here's my remote access setup...

Secure shell access  No Access[Private]Public
Allow administrative command line access over secure shell  [No]Yes
Allow secure shell access using standard passwords  No[Yes]
 
Any ideas what to try, where to look?

JR.

[stephen noble]

how about you pull the whole thing out and start again

this time use the new userpanel that shad lords and i have been working on

http://www.dungog.net/sme/howto/delegate.php
http://www.dungog.net/sme/files/userpanel/

we're still tweaking it but it's works well

regards
stephen noble

dungog.net/sme

[James Redfern]

stephen noble wrote:
>
>
> how about you pull the whole thing out and start again
>
> this time use the new userpanel that shad lords and i have
> been working on
>
> http://www.dungog.net/sme/howto/delegate.php
> http://www.dungog.net/sme/files/userpanel/
>
> we're still tweaking it but it's works well

The plot thickens...

| Package removed successfully
| The package titled dungog-pkg-usermanager has been removed.

JR.

[James Redfern]

Seems to be installing as its supposed to, but...  it picked up the existing users and gave them some default panel assignments and made them red in the list.  Neat.  I deleted one test account and then added another.  It gave the new account the default assignments but left it black and the others red.

And as for getting 'https://www.privacyx.co.uk/user-manager' to work, this is still all I get.  

[Mon Sep 23 16:14:23 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] client denied by server configuration: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:980/user-manager/
[Mon Sep 23 16:14:51 2002] [error] mod_ssl: Cannot open SSLSessionCache DBM file /etc/httpd/logs/ssl_scache' for reading (fetch) (System error follows)
[Mon Sep 23 16:14:51 2002] [error] System: Permission denied (errno: 13)
[Mon Sep 23 16:14:51 2002] [error] mod_ssl: Cannot open SSLSessionCache DBM file /etc/httpd/logs/ssl_scache' for writing (store) (System error follows)
[Mon Sep 23 16:14:51 2002] [error] System: Permission denied (errno: 13)
[Mon Sep 23 16:14:51 2002] [error] mod_ssl: Cannot open SSLSessionCache DBM file /etc/httpd/logs/ssl_scache' for reading (fetch) (System error follows)

I am beginning to suspect there is more than a little something different to the way 'server-manager' works.  The host is on a DMZ so, my line of thought was, if one works, the other ought to.

JR.

[stephen noble]

>It gave the new account the default assignments but left it black and the others red.

fair enough, were deciding what will be the default panels will be, we didn't notice the red/black thing

i've never tested  user-manager works over https,
it's getting closer but maybe not close enough

this current version makes it safer for mitel to consider intergrating the user-manager in some form,

stephen

[James Redfern]

stephen noble wrote:
> i've never tested  user-manager works over https,
> it's getting closer but maybe not close enough

Keep going... don't stop!
 
> this current version makes it safer for mitel to consider
> intergrating the user-manager in some form,

Just a thought, why not have everyone set up their 'Global' account and then take that as the default for everyone.  That way admin can decide for him/herself and you wont get into a pissing contest with those who think they know better.

Just my 0.02c... YMMVOC.

JR.

[stephen noble]

>Just a thought, why not have everyone set up their 'Global' account and then >take that as the default for everyone.

that's the idea
for an early version my default was no panels which caused confusion
but i don't think all the userpanls should be available to everyone

we just make a suggestion, and make it easy for admin to change

stephen