Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

Legacy Forums => General Discussion (Legacy) => Topic started by: duncan on January 20, 2004, 11:27:03 AM

Title: Looks good.
Post by: duncan on January 20, 2004, 11:27:03 AM

Wasnt sure id clicked on the right link at first. Top effort.

Regards Duncan

Title: Looks good.
Post by: Bernt on January 20, 2004, 01:23:04 PM

This is very nice. Well done. :-)

Title: Not bad -- not bad...
Post by: greg on January 20, 2004, 02:13:35 PM

Looks fine. Must get used to the new feeling...
Nice work...
Greg

Title: Looks good, but ...
Post by: Robert on January 20, 2004, 02:46:26 PM

I like the new look of the homepage much better than the old look, excellent job, but ... can we please have the old forum code back! These forums are a pain to browse through.

Title: Looks good.
Post by: jcoleman on January 20, 2004, 04:13:06 PM

Take a look at this FAQ:

http://no.longer.valid/xoopsfaq/index.php?cat_id=2#q8

Hopefully that will answer your quesions.

-jeff

Title: Looks good.
Post by: Chrille on January 20, 2004, 08:08:07 PM

:-D

Thank You for your excellent work with the new homepage!

Thanx again!

/Chrille

Title: Looks good.
Post by: mthomas on January 20, 2004, 11:57:57 PM

Nice job on the new look gang. BTW, I like the phpBB forums. <G>

Title: Here comes the new stuff . . .
Post by: gbentley on January 21, 2004, 12:05:08 AM

I Agree. like the fresh look and appreciate all the work that has gone into the site etc.

One thread I read on here I think could still be looked at is the rpm
contribs that enhance the functionality of the flat .iso install.

Would it be possible to have them listed by function rather than by author ?

And also cross referenced eg

-------- Package ------ Category ------ See Also ------ Tested Against
SME SpamAssassin ------ Email ------ Clamav ------ 6.0.1
SME Shared Drive ------ Storage ------ isoloopback ------ 6.0.0

I am not exactly explaining this right and its a bit late for me but I think
you get my idea.

Also, maybe a voting system that gets the most used contrib added
/ included in the next release (as long as its fully tested etc :)

Are these suggestions feasable ?

Comments welcome :)

Title: Looks good.
Post by: ChrisG on January 21, 2004, 01:34:30 AM

Wow... a HUGE upgrade... thanks to Jeff and crew for the hard work!

Title: Not so good.
Post by: David on January 21, 2004, 04:51:15 AM

Possible generic bug but in  Mozilla 1.0.2 the menu items take up a screen width, and the content then takes up another 1/3 a page off the screen. Very annoying.

Perhaps its a known bug with Xoops? or Mozilla/.

Title: You mean I gotta learn new stuff now? The site looks great!
Post by: nsh on January 21, 2004, 09:14:04 PM

:pint:

Title: Re: Not so good.
Post by: midtoad on January 22, 2004, 06:44:35 AM

Quote from: "David"

Possible generic bug but in  Mozilla 1.0.2 the menu items take up a screen width, and the content then takes up another 1/3 a page off the screen. Very annoying.

Perhaps its a known bug with Xoops? or Mozilla/.

FWIW, the forum looks fine under Mozilla 1.4 and Konqueror 3.1.4 under Mandrake Linux 9.2. The menus are about 15% of the page, and the rest is content.