Koozali.org: home of the SME Server
Legacy Forums => General Discussion (Legacy) => Topic started by: Anonymous on April 18, 2004, 12:40:14 AM
-
Hi all
6.01.-01 custom
Is anyone having this problem.
I install dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-3.noarch.rpm
When I ftp to
ftp://user@www.domain.com
the directory the user is sent to is
/home/e-smith/files
not
/home/e-smith/files/users/user/home
Chroot User: yes
thanks & have a good day
-
Use the Ftp Root Directory Nominate Panel (http://no.longer.valid/phpwiki/index.php/How%20to%20install%20chroot%20for%20FTP) to modify the directory the user arrives at after ftp'ing in.
-
My experience:
Fresh install of 6.01-01 with restore from desktop of the user accounts and files. Intalled dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-3.noarch.rpm
> rpm -Uvh dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-3.noarch.rpm
....and had pages upon pages of errors.
Fired up server-manager and there was the nice Dungog.net section and the panel. However, no amount of changes in the panel chrooted the users at all. Everyone still had access back to /home/e-smith/files
So, uninstalled it:
> rpm -e dungog-proftpd-chroot
Then installed the earlier version (which works gloriously well on the 5.6U6 installation):
> rpm -Uvh dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-2.noarch.rpm
Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
1:dungog-proftpd-chroot ########################################### [100%]
[root@SERVER_NAME chroot]#
As you can see, not a single error.
Fired up the server-manager. Down the bottom is a section titled 'Unknown' with 'dungog-proftpchroot' listed. The usual panel is there and upon testing it worked as perfectly as it did with 5.6U6. All users chrooted to where I wanted them.
Bliss.
So, I have to suggest that the new 6.01-01 is NOT compatible with dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-3.noarch.rpm
However, dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-3.noarch.rpm may be compatible with earlier v6.x series releases. (I don't know as I've only just moved to 6.01-01 from 5.6U6).
-
So, I have to suggest that the new 6.01-01 is NOT compatible with dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-3.noarch.rpm
However, dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-3.noarch.rpm may be compatible with earlier v6.x series releases. (I don't know as I've only just moved to 6.01-01 from 5.6U6).
That may be so, but the most recent release is dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-5.noarch.rpm (Sept 22, 2004) which I just installed on two 6.01-01 servers today with no problems.
-
That may be so, but the most recent release is dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-5.noarch.rpm
Congratulations. You've managed to dig up a post concerning a contrib you were not running and post a comment on a later contrib.
What was your point that couldn't have been made by starting a new thread addressing your success?
-
USE dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-5.noarch.rpm - it works on 6.0x
...and it's also the current version.
Thanks Shilotsugu !!!
:-D :-D even if I personally do not need it :-D :-D
For guys/gals who need this solution pls grab the rpm right here:
http://www.dungog.net/sme/files/dungog-proftpd-chroot-0.1-5.noarch.rpm
"F" just ga or stfu instead of (again and again) flaming helpful replies ... IMnsHO ... :-? :evil: :hammer:
Regards
Reinhold
P.S.:
"Guest" ... please do register - it seems the right thing to do if you ask for help :-D :pint:
"OPS/Moderators" - I thought we all had/have to register before being able to post ... did something break in the recent transfer ???
-
Reinhold,
Take a look at the dates the Guest poster made his entires. They predate our policy change.
BTW, I had to look twice too to make sure. :-)
-jeff
-
"F" just ga or stfu instead of (again and again) flaming helpful replies ... IMnsHO ... :-? :evil: :hammer:
Hey, sunshine. GET STUFFED!
If you don't have the balls to call it when it needs to be called then why not STFU yourself, eh? Just because you're a spineless wimp who babies the incompetents DOES NOT MEAN I HAVE TO.
-
Gentlemen,
There are to be no personal attacks or foul language here - Period.
Either act in a professional. courteous manner or take your posts elsewhere.
This applies to everyone with NO exceptions.
-jeff
-
Jeff,
.../me standing close enough for a dance on that
:roll: "babying the incompent":roll:
Reinhold
BTW: Thanks for the date clarification!