Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

Legacy Forums => Experienced User Forum => Topic started by: ltc6netspec on May 07, 2004, 03:49:12 PM

Title: Attachment going through Problem
Post by: ltc6netspec on May 07, 2004, 03:49:12 PM
I am trying to allow up to 5MB messages to go through, but I keep getting this message:


2004-05-06 18:28:21.724335500 tcpserver: status: 7/40
2004-05-06 18:28:21.724474500 tcpserver: pid 21806 from 69.43.146.164
2004-05-06 18:28:21.725345500 tcpserver: ok 21806 0:64.107.103.67:25 :69.43.146.164::11631
2004-05-06 18:28:21.728210500 rblsmtpd: 69.43.146.164 pid 21806: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL13850
2004-05-06 18:28:25.998601500 Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/AMAVIS/MTA/Qmail.pm line 124.
2004-05-06 18:28:25.998916500 Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/AMAVIS/MTA/Qmail.pm line 127.
2004-05-06 18:28:25.999132500 Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/AMAVIS.pm line 421.
2004-05-06 18:28:25.999924500 Use of uninitialized value in -d at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/AMAVIS.pm line 672.
2004-05-06 18:28:25.999976500 Use of uninitialized value in -f at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/AMAVIS.pm line 672.
2004-05-06 18:28:26.000008500 Use of uninitialized value in -l at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/AMAVIS.pm line 672.
2004-05-06 18:28:26.000038500 Use of uninitialized value in -l at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/AMAVIS.pm line 672.
2004-05-06 18:28:26.000068500 Use of uninitialized value in -l at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/AMAVIS.pm line 672.
2004-05-06 18:28:26.014120500 smtpfront-qmail[21804]: Sorry, that message exceeds the maximum message length.
2004-05-06 18:28:26.014296500 smtpfront-qmail[21804]: Writing data to qmail-queue failed.


In the etc/amavis-ng/amavis.conf I've changed the max space to 1000M, changed the maxmessagesize to 5000000.  I am using 6.0.1 with (PageFault)Clam AV & SpamAssissin.  Any ideas

Thanks in advance[/b]
Title: disregard the Spamhaus section
Post by: netspecltc6 on May 07, 2004, 06:35:52 PM
disregard the Spamhaus section.  Just look at the amavis section.
Title: disregard the Spamhaus section
Post by: netspecltc6 on May 07, 2004, 08:49:11 PM
disregard the Spamhaus section.  Just look at the amavis section.
Title: Re: Attachment going through Problem
Post by: raem on May 07, 2004, 09:23:20 PM
Dear ltc6netspec

> [21804]: Sorry, that message exceeds the maximum message length.
> changed the maxmessagesize to 5000000.  

You need to make the setting (which is total message size) a little larger than the required attachment size to allow for message overheads etc say 5500000


> 2004-05-06 18:28:21.728210500 rblsmtpd: 69.43.146.164 pid 21806: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL13850


If this entry relates to the message, then that particular message is being blocked as the sender is listed on spamhaus sbl and will never get through, you must be using RBLList blcoking.


> value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/AMAVIS/MTA/Qmail.pm line 124.
> 2004-05-06 18:28:25.998916500 Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/AMAVIS/MTA/Qmail.pm line 127.


This type of entry is known to the developers, it is not a problem, just an undefined value that the system does not know what to do with.

Regs
Ray
Title: message size
Post by: Bob - ltc6netspec on May 07, 2004, 10:18:48 PM
The attachment was approx. 4.1MB no text to speak of.
Title: Re: Attachment going through Problem
Post by: raem on May 08, 2004, 03:13:06 AM
ltc6netspec

> In the etc/amavis-ng/amavis.conf I've changed the max space to 1000M,
> changed the maxmessagesize to 5000000.  

Perhaps you are speaking of a different messagesize setting than the one I'm referring to ?
Have you done this ?

/sbin/e-smith/db configuration setprop smtpfront-qmail MaxMessageSize 5500000
/sbin/e-smith/signal-event email-update

Please let us know
Regs
Ray
Title: the Attachment size problem
Post by: netspecltc6 on May 10, 2004, 04:56:31 PM
Mitchell,

Thanks for responsing.

I've tried similar commands from previous replies to other requests, but it would seem yours worked this time.

Thanks again