Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

Obsolete Releases => SME 7.x Contribs => Topic started by: groyk on June 28, 2008, 05:27:59 PM

Title: Sysmon vs System-Monitor
Post by: groyk on June 28, 2008, 05:27:59 PM
Hi

What is the difference on Sysmon and System-monitor?? As I can read in this forum is that System monitor is based on an old version of Sysmon.

But at the same time I can see MasterSleepy has developed on both Sysmon and System monitor!!

What is the difference, and why are these 2 maybe similar contribs not merged as one?

Simon
Title: Re: Sysmon vs System-Monitor
Post by: christian on June 30, 2008, 05:20:18 PM
sysmon was probably the original.

Master Sleepy then updated it but kept it the same name which was causing some confusion.

Mastersleepy then changed the name to system-monitor to avoid confusion and yum conflicts.

I use system-monitor on my 7.3 system.

Christian
Title: Re: Sysmon vs System-Monitor
Post by: cactus on June 30, 2008, 10:33:25 PM
Master Sleepy then updated it but kept it the same name which was causing some confusion.
He reused almost all code claiming it was his work, which in fact was not the case... but lets not start that discussion anymore.
Title: Re: Sysmon vs System-Monitor
Post by: okepc on July 01, 2008, 10:10:15 AM
Cactus why post that unnecessary reaction?

Are you on a quest to piss of certain contributor and drive him away?

Sick and tired of flames...

Sincerely yours

Dirk
Title: Re: Sysmon vs System-Monitor
Post by: cactus on July 01, 2008, 12:15:30 PM
Cactus why post that unnecessary reaction?
It is to illustrate that there is almost no differences between the contribs and I already said I did not want to raise that discussion again.

My opinion is that the you'd better stick with the smeserver-sysmon contrib as this is:
To go short smeserver-sysmon has the QA tools and facilities that smeserver-systemmonitor lacks, besides the fact that it is not nice to claim code that has been written by others, as even when released under GPL licenses, you are not allowed to claim ownership[ when the code is not yours.
Title: Re: Sysmon vs System-Monitor
Post by: MasterSleepy on July 01, 2008, 01:54:24 PM
Hello All,

There is an old discussion that already focus on that.
The final conclusion was, and still be, USE SYSMON.

Shortly, all new dev that are in system_monitor will be in sysmon.
I said shortly because I'm really short of time.

Regs,

MasterSleepy.
Title: Re: Sysmon vs System-Monitor
Post by: cactus on July 01, 2008, 02:38:38 PM
Hello All,

There is an old discussion that already focus on that.
The final conclusion was, and still be, USE SYSMON.
Thanks for your reply.

Shortly, all new dev that are in system_monitor will be in sysmon.
I said shortly because I'm really short of time.
Let me know if you need some help. I'll be glad to be of assistance.