Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

Obsolete Releases => SME Server 9.x => Topic started by: Michail Pappas on March 17, 2016, 12:22:12 PM

Title: [SOLVED] RAID created even though no RAID selected during install?
Post by: Michail Pappas on March 17, 2016, 12:22:12 PM

During installation of 9.1, I elected in the initial screen to do an install without LVM and without any mirroring (server is running as a VM). However, I received mails that I am running in degraded mode. From that, it seems that /dev/sda1 is indeed allocated to a dev array, whereas the actual storage is on a simple ext4 /dev/sda3 partition:

Code: [Select]

# fdisk -l /dev/sda

Disk /dev/sda: 32.2 GB, 32212254720 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3916 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x000b51e5

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *           1          32      256000   fd  Linux raid autodetect
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda2              32         424     3145728   82  Linux swap / Solaris
Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda3             424        3917    28054528   83  Linux


# mount
/dev/sda3 on / type ext4 (rw,usrquota,grpquota)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
/dev/md0 on /boot type ext4 (rw)
none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw)

1) Is this a bug?

2) Can I somehow easily convert the partition to a normal linux boot partition?

Title: Re: RAID created even though no RAID selected during install?
Post by: Stefano on March 17, 2016, 03:46:52 PM

no, it's a feature.. /boot is always on raid1

anyway, you can safely ignore the message

Title: Re: [SOLVED] RAID created even though no RAID selected during install?
Post by: Michail Pappas on March 17, 2016, 04:16:51 PM

Thanks. Seems a bit strange, however I presume there was some reason behind this choice.

Title: Re: [SOLVED] RAID created even though no RAID selected during install?
Post by: Daniel B. on March 17, 2016, 04:26:43 PM

You can mark the array so that it work with a single drive, and will not report a degraded state:

Code: [Select]

mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --raid-devices=1 --force


Title: Re: [SOLVED] RAID created even though no RAID selected during install?
Post by: Michail Pappas on March 18, 2016, 07:27:05 AM

Done that Daniel, thanks!

Title: Re: [SOLVED] RAID created even though no RAID selected during install?
Post by: CharlieBrady on March 18, 2016, 01:58:25 PM

Quote from: Michail Pappas on March 17, 2016, 12:22:12 PM

However, I received mails that I am running in degraded mode.

You shouldn't. If there has been no drive failure you shouldn't receive any warning emails. Please file a bug report with details.

Title: Re: [SOLVED] RAID created even though no RAID selected during install?
Post by: Michail Pappas on March 19, 2016, 10:36:28 AM

That will be a problem, since those mails are deleted... Can I revert to the previous situation somehow, for testing purposes?

Title: Re: [SOLVED] RAID created even though no RAID selected during install?
Post by: Michail Pappas on March 21, 2016, 06:29:47 AM

Never mind, I will try to reproduce this on a clean install. If I do, I'll create a bug report directly, can you please instruct which logs to upload?

Title: Re: [SOLVED] RAID created even though no RAID selected during install?
Post by: Michail Pappas on March 21, 2016, 08:09:34 AM

On a fresh 9.1 install I did not receive such mails, until I started the /etc/init.d/mdmonitor service. When I did, a "DegradedArray event on /dev/md0:test" was generated.

mdmonitor was not running before. It was also not running on my production system, whereas the issue was initially encountered.

Not sure if this is a bug or feature, so how would you like me to proceed?