Koozali.org: home of the SME Server
Legacy Forums => General Discussion (Legacy) => Topic started by: Tony Z on January 04, 2003, 09:03:12 PM
-
This may sound like a dumb question. but I have been using e-smith for a while now and absolutely love it. As I try to convince others to use it, am I correct assuming that it is more secure than other distributions because if someone does happen to compromise a config file, the templates would replace the corrupted config file once they are expanded again? I am assuming this is the case, but just want to make sure before I give out wrong information. Thanks!
Tony Z
-
No, that's not really what makes SME more secure than many other distributions, although I'm sure it helps a bit. Security is a function of the specific configuration (firewall, etc.) and the software that's used (qmail instead of sendmail, for example).