Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

Legacy Forums => General Discussion (Legacy) => Topic started by: Mark on November 04, 2003, 04:38:51 AM

Title: OT: To open the port or not...
Post by: Mark on November 04, 2003, 04:38:51 AM

Having read through the postings about opening a port on SME, I have decided to leave SME as it is and build another server to host an application that needs to have a non-standard port open for TCP.

There are so many Linux distributions. I am interested in one that has a high quality admin panel for opening and closing ports. Also, while I don't need a robust GUI for OS, I do have another application that does need frame buffer, virtual or otherwise.  

So far, RedHat, Mandrake and Suse have been suggested. RedHat seems to be getting quite large. I have yet to review the others.

Does anyone have an opinion they care to share?

Title: Re: OT: To open the port or not...
Post by: Byte on November 04, 2003, 11:54:48 AM

Have you tried Smoothwall?

Title: Re: OT: To open the port or not...
Post by: Ergin on November 04, 2003, 07:27:17 PM

How about SuSe ? I think they have done a real good job...

Title: Re: OT: To open the port or not...
Post by: Mark on November 04, 2003, 08:31:12 PM

Thanks for the suggestions. I will check them out.

Title: Re: OT: To open the port or not...
Post by: Dan Williams on November 05, 2003, 08:58:23 PM

Out of curiosity, what ports were you wondering about opening?
Often times there are ways to safely do this on your existing box.
Dan

Title: Re: OT: To open the port or not...
Post by: Mark on November 06, 2003, 05:25:16 AM

Which port isn't terribly important. I have control of both sides of the chasm and so can choose to avoid well known ports.

The key thing is that I like the way SME works and I am not familiar with the template system. I am new to Linux, which poses some challenges. FWIW, I am reading like mad and splitting my knuckles where I can. Still I hesitate to break something that works, soooo....

I am considering an alternative. No question that opening a port on the SME server and starting the thread is the shortest route at the moment.

What do you suggest?

 - Mark

Title: Re: OT: To open the port or not...
Post by: Jeff Coleman on November 07, 2003, 11:24:59 PM

Go to:
 http://mirror.contribs.org/smeserver/contribs/dmay/mitel/contrib/portopening/

And I think you'll find what you want.

If you control both sides there is no downside to opening the ports.

-jeff

Title: Re: OT: To open the port or not...
Post by: Charlie on November 11, 2003, 12:55:44 AM

Jeff Coleman wrote:
>
> Go to:
>  http://mirror.contribs.org/smeserver/contribs/dmay/mitel/contrib/portopening/
>
> And I think you'll find what you want.
>
> If you control both sides there is no downside to opening the
> ports.
>
> -jeff

Any idea if the one for SME5.6 will work with SME6.0?

Title: Re: OT: To open the port or not...
Post by: Charlie on November 11, 2003, 12:58:30 AM

Jeff Coleman wrote:
>
> Go to:
>  http://mirror.contribs.org/smeserver/contribs/dmay/mitel/contrib/portopening/
>
> And I think you'll find what you want.
>
> If you control both sides there is no downside to opening the
> ports.
>
> -jeff

Any idea if the one for SME5.6 will work with SME6.0?