Your reply is duly noted. I understand that e-smith wants its own hard drive,
and so it has ... the secondary master. What I want is a way to persuade
the BeOS boot manager to hand off to lilo at boot time and run e-smith
from the secondary master (hdc). WinDoze & BeOS have hda.
I had high hopes for a procedure I just performed: I re-set up e-smith
booting from CD at primary master and HDD at secondary master.
E-smith booted just fine, and I ran lilo just to be sure, with lilo.conf
reflecting hdc. Checked fstab, too.
Rebooted without CD, everything's great. Repowered primary master,
re-set up Boot Manager, no boot. Same message, "Boot sector
signature not found."
I'd be more than willing to use lilo to triple-boot, but the BeOS
boot manager is a little slicker. If any of you linux gurus can point
me in the right direction with lilo, that'd be fine. (My first several
attempts have failed.)
I know this triple-boot is possible!!!
Thanks to all who've paid attention thus far. Replies are appreciated.
Robert Boerner wrote:
>
> Wouldn't do it

>
> Seriously, e-smith is designed to take over the whole disk
> drive you installed it on, and when you did the install as
> the primary master drive, it sets up the fstab file (as well
> as lilo.conf) to point to certain partitions (which get
> labeled as being on the Primary Master Drive). When you moved
> it, everything changed from the fstab file point of view (and
> from lilo's). You could go ahead and modify the /etc/fstab
> file by hand (you did make the emergency floppy didn't you?
>

, but again...e-smith is really meant to act as a stand
> alone box.
>
> As far as removing the Be boot manager, when you did the
> e-smith install, it nuked it. It completely wipes the disk
> including the MBR.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I love BeOS. I am running 5.03 Pro, and
> triple booting it with Redhat 7.0 and Win98SE.