Greg Zartman wrote:
> I know you've stated this many times in the past, but I can't
> see what the problem is with DSL routers? I've been using
> one (the Cisco 678) for nearly five years now with absolutely
> no trouble. The issue isn't the router, but how the router
> is configured. My Cisco router is not offering any
> firewalling functionality at all, for example.
Quite possibly then it isn't acting as a router at all, but is configured in bridged mode.
My beef is with the many newbies who naively use an inexpensive DSL/cable firewall/router, then immediately get into difficulties trying to reconfigure firewalls and port forward protocols that they do not understand, and without any of the troubleshooting skills that would help them get the job done smoothly. These people would all be better off to connect their SME server directly to their cable modem or DSL router, and have the system "just work", out of the box.
> The major bonus I get with my router is the ability to access
> connection information and parameters. I can hook a laptop
> up to my WAN hub and access the router directly if I'm having
> a problem with my connection. I can also access my router
> via SSH from home, if needed.
Pretty much all of this is also true of the SME server itself, when it is managing the connection, rather than an independent box.
Charlie