Charlie Wrote :
>You obviously know very little about Dan Bernstein. Google will tell you more.
Granted. Then again, I know very little about just about everyone at Mitel, Microsoft, Symantec, etc. yet I still choose to put faith in their products, support (if any), etc.

Anyway, from what I can tell by reading Dan's licensing as well as other discussions on the net, patching is not disalllowed and therefore if anyone out there with enough knowledge to do so should be free to distribute a patch file / program to accomplish what we want as long as the patch is applied to the original binary distribution.
Obviously, patching a patched version is asking for trouble, but as clearly implied, the qmail program distributed with SME has to be the original unmodified version. So anyone producing a patch for the qmail in the SME server should not have an issue with this (unless they have already applied some other patch !).
> You would be wasting your time. You are almost certain to get no reply.
Won't know till you try. It might take a 5 minute e-mail and if he does reply positively, this would save days, even weeks of working around the problem. Like the problem with bind in 5.1.2 I brought up a while back. If there is a simple enough way to fix the issue in an existing 5.1.2 server (in this case upgrade bind), why would you force the client to upgrade their server to a newer version (free software or otherwise, there are issues with inconvenience, downtime, etc.). Plus a risk that the new version might not work correctly on their existing hardware, etc. (been there, done that!).
Kelvin