Greg, while it's noble of you to rush to the defense of C.Bharda and krustykev, I stand by my posts. The signal-to-noise ratio in these forums is fairly high as such things go: cross-posting and asking elementary questions will only increase the noise level. If I can persuade either of the gentlemen in question, and perhaps others, to do a bit of thinking & researching on their own ... or at least to think twice before posting ("the burned child fears the fire") ... I'll feel I've done fairly well.
Yes, there are groups that get a lot of newbie questions. Samba has no doubt been discussed many times therein. I think it's just plain lazy to ask such questions outside of those groups, period. At least I'm consistent ... I refer you to
http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=4832.msg16838#msg16838wherein I flamed a knucklehead who had the gall to say that asking in the forum was easier than doing the legwork because of "time restrictions"! Sheesh!
What prompted my missive was Bharda's assertion that while he knows crossposting is annoying, it's OK for HIM to do it so he'll get the most responses. No, Cyrus -- it's not OK on Usenet and it's not OK here. Especially when done knowingly.
You are very nearly correct, Greg, in your understanding of what I meant by "troll." In Usenet terms, "troll" has two meanings. Both derive, as you inferred, from fishing. A message that is a troll is one that is designed *specifically* as flamebait ... so in responding to krustykev's message, I in fact responded to a message I considered a troll, and became the object of the verb form.
The second sense of the word "troll" is fairly obvious: one who posts messages that are trolls is him/herself a troll. So you were mostly correct, except that a troll trolls for flames, not just information.
A true troll revels in flamewars and is always trying to start something, which I don't now think is the case with krustykev. (He'd've done something much more interesting than just offer to kick my ass, if so.)
The document Charlie recommended is great. I think I'll close with this quote:
"So, while it isn't necessary to already be technically competent to get attention from us, it is necessary to demonstrate the kind of attitude that leads to competence — alert, thoughtful, observant, willing to be an active partner in developing a solution. If you can't live with this sort of discrimination, we suggest you pay somebody for a commercial support contract instead of asking hackers to personally donate help to you."
Amen to that!