alec,
Just becaues I'm (sort of) lucky with the IBMs doesn't mean you have too be. - There are quite many reports that the (early) drives failed en masse and that their new firmware (moving the heads when idle for some extended time) doesn't always work...
Just don't come running to me for a 40euros crash

The 160G Hitachis should be much safer... (NO reports)
I have to admit that I installed software Raid1 and Raid5 with different manufacturers harddisks. Since Linux Software Raid is partition-based it always worked...
Make sure however that those disk have about the same size (the smallest HD determines the "size of the pack"), that the speed is about the same "mostly the slowest HD determines the speed of the ... (you know what) and last but not least... get as big an "on board HD cache" as you can afford ...
In summary: better use identical spec'd HDs (personally I still have mixed feelings about mixed installations where I had to make compromises).
Why not buy another one of that (hopefully not hardware) "crashed disk" ???
Regards
Reinhold
P.S.: Don't be too cheap - time and data represent much more value than a cheap disk does!