Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

dovecot 0.99.14 RPM available

Offline m

  • *****
  • 276
  • +0/-0
  • Peet
dovecot 0.99.14 RPM available
« on: March 22, 2005, 08:02:56 PM »
for further information see bug tracker ticket #0000196
http://no.longer.valid/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0000196

Michael

Offline bushinc

  • ***
  • 62
  • +0/-0
    • http://www.bushinc.com
dovecot 0.99.14 RPM available
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2005, 11:01:56 PM »
Installed on my home server.
So far so good.

Thanks for taking the time to distribute this.
...

Offline mdo

  • *
  • 355
  • +0/-0
dovecot 0.99.14 RPM available
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2005, 11:10:11 AM »
Many Thanks Michael! We will try that.

Regards,
Michael
...

Offline jackl

  • ****
  • 136
  • +0/-0
dovecot 0.99.14 RPM available
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2005, 08:24:19 PM »
Well Done Michael,

Sorry about the late post on this. I ran your script on one of our servers and all appears fine, will give it a week and then will apply it to all other servers.
I will let you know if we encounter any further bugs or problems.

Many Thanks

Jack
......

Offline m

  • *****
  • 276
  • +0/-0
  • Peet
dovecot 0.99.14 RPM available
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2005, 10:55:35 PM »
Thanks to all for the replies,
this is just to let you know, that we using this rpm on all of our servers, among them there are heavly used ones with few hundred of users and high mail traffic. We did not observed any problems up to now. I again strongly recommend to upgrade to avoid a server freeze simply by receiving a malformed mail as described in the bug tracker.
Michael

mach1_4fun

dovecot 0.99.14 RPM available
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2005, 10:49:42 PM »
in this contrib for version 6.01?
if so I am glad to hear it!, the old dovecot version is driving me nuts

Offline m

  • *****
  • 276
  • +0/-0
  • Peet
dovecot 0.99.14 RPM available
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2005, 11:07:20 PM »
Quote from: "mach1_4fun"
in this contrib for version 6.01?

Although compiled and tested on SME6.0, I can see no reason why it should not work on SME6.01, SME6.5 or any other RH7.3 based linux.
SME6.0, SME6.01 and SME6.5RC1 using identical 0.99.10-01es4 RPM.