Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

SME7p1 upgrade..

Offline bcliburn

  • ***
  • 41
  • +0/-0
SME7p1 upgrade..
« on: January 15, 2006, 11:48:44 PM »
I have installed SME 7p1, when p2 and or the final release come out will I be able to update them with yum, or will I have to reinstall or upgrade with the new iso?

Offline stefan24

  • *****
  • 483
  • +0/-0
    • www.sme-server.de
SME7p1 upgrade..
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2006, 11:01:35 AM »
yes, you can update it via yum to the new version without installing a new iso.
I have done that with a beta 8 to beta 9 and pre1.
The new version is shown then in the copyright footer of the server-manager screen.

Offline AaronG

  • ****
  • 90
  • +0/-0
    • http://www.healthinc.com.au
SME7p1 upgrade..
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2006, 01:02:53 PM »
Hi stefan,

this post is very similar to my previous post about the automatic updates...

I have my automatic updates turned on. I think it has been upgraded from beta8 to beta9 - my server reports this "SME Server 7.0beta9" in the copyright footer. Should it have been upgraded by YUM to pre1 yet or hasn't it been released to YUM yet?

Cheers
Aaron
...

Offline stefan24

  • *****
  • 483
  • +0/-0
    • www.sme-server.de
SME7p1 upgrade..
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2006, 04:08:22 PM »
I did a manual update from the shell.

yum update. That was all and afterwards I had this footer:

--------
SME Server 7.0pre1
Copyright 1999-2005 Mitel Corporation
All rights reserved.

Offline chris burnat

  • *****
  • 1,135
  • +2/-0
    • http://www.burnat.com
SME7p1 upgrade..
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2006, 10:10:02 PM »
Code: [Select]
I have my automatic updates turned on. I think it has been upgraded from beta8 to beta9 - my server reports this "SME Server 7.0beta9" in the copyright footer. Should it have been upgraded by YUM to pre1 yet or hasn't it been released to YUM yet?


Aaron, if anything doesn't work correctly, please report via the bug tracker - http://wiki.contribs.org/bugzilla . Please describe exactly what you have done and exactly what you see in response.
- chris
If it does not work out of the box, please fill in a Bug Report @ Bugzilla (http://bugs.contribs.org)  - check: http://wiki.contribs.org/Bugzilla_Help .  Thanks.

Offline byte

  • *
  • 2,183
  • +2/-0
SME7p1 upgrade..
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2006, 11:44:23 PM »
Quote from: "AaronG"
Hi stefan,

this post is very similar to my previous post about the automatic updates...

I have my automatic updates turned on. I think it has been upgraded from beta8 to beta9 - my server reports this "SME Server 7.0beta9" in the copyright footer. Should it have been upgraded by YUM to pre1 yet or hasn't it been released to YUM yet?

Cheers
Aaron


Did you do...

signal-event post-upgrade

then

signal-event reboot

After doing a yum update from 7.0b9 to Pre1
--[byte]--

Have you filled in a Bug Report over @ http://bugs.contribs.org ? Please don't wait to be told this way you help us to help you/others - Thanks!

Offline AaronG

  • ****
  • 90
  • +0/-0
    • http://www.healthinc.com.au
SME7p1 upgrade..
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2006, 12:08:21 AM »
Quote

Did you do...
signal-event post-upgrade
then
signal-event reboot
After doing a yum update from 7.0b9 to Pre1


Hi Byte,

I have not performed any terminal commands on my server. I have been relying solely on the "Software Installer" in the service Manager. All Modules in the listbox have been selected to be upgraded.

Should I perform a YUM update via the command line and then the signal-event commands as you suggested????

See below - this is what I get... as you can see SHELL still reports that it is version beta9.

Code: [Select]
---------------------------------------------------------
CentOS release 4.2 (Final) - SME Server 7.0beta9
[root@smelinux7 ~]# yum update
Setting up Update Process
Setting up repositories
smeaddons                 100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
contrib                   100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
updates                   100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
base                      100% |=========================| 1.1 kB    00:00
smeos                     100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
smeupdates                100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
Reading repository metadata in from local files
No Packages marked for Update/Obsoletion
[root@smelinux7 ~]# No Packages marked for Update/Obsoletion
-------------------------------------------------------


Should it be updating to version pre1 from Beta9 using YUM?

Burnat: I am not sure if this a bug or normal behaviour... I will definately report it as being a bug if someone can tell me that it IS in fact a bug.


Cheers
Aaron
...

Offline byte

  • *
  • 2,183
  • +2/-0
SME7p1 upgrade..
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2006, 12:19:30 AM »
I have done "yum -y upgrade" from command line to update my 7.0b8 > 7.0b9 then to 7.0pre1 all via yum and rembering to run those other commands in my post after each upgrade...

The server manager will do the same but rember to do a re-configure in the panel after doing  a YUM

HTH
--[byte]--

Have you filled in a Bug Report over @ http://bugs.contribs.org ? Please don't wait to be told this way you help us to help you/others - Thanks!

Offline AaronG

  • ****
  • 90
  • +0/-0
    • http://www.healthinc.com.au
SME7p1 upgrade..
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2006, 12:24:58 AM »
It WORKED!!!  :-D

Thanks for your help... I think my problem was exactly what you said. I wasn't doing a RECONFIGURE from the server-manager and/or wasn't using the signal-event commands.

I thought that because it was setup to do it all automatically that I wouldn't have to do the reconfigure reboots etc


Cheers
Aaron
...

Offline byte

  • *
  • 2,183
  • +2/-0
SME7p1 upgrade..
« Reply #9 on: January 17, 2006, 12:25:29 AM »
Someone has already posted bug, but been marked invalid...

http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385

I think IIRC i did an yum upgrade before and reboot without applying the...

signal-event post-upgrade

signal-event reboot
--[byte]--

Have you filled in a Bug Report over @ http://bugs.contribs.org ? Please don't wait to be told this way you help us to help you/others - Thanks!