Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

Call recording (One touch recording)

Offline madadam

  • *
  • 149
  • +0/-0
    • http://www.extremetourist.com
Re: Call recording (One touch recording)
« Reply #15 on: April 16, 2009, 04:04:03 AM »
Any news on this Selintra?

Cheers,

Adam
...

Offline SARK devs

  • *****
  • 2,806
  • +1/-0
    • http://sarkpbx.com
Re: Call recording (One touch recording)
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2009, 08:05:39 AM »
We intriduced a bug sometime in the 700s which causes recording not to work properly.  It is being addressed as part of some wider recording work we are doing.  The latest  version we have in test here (svn trunk) seems to be OK with both one-touch and permanent local-recording.  We should be able to get it out the door in a week or so.

Best

S

Offline madadam

  • *
  • 149
  • +0/-0
    • http://www.extremetourist.com
Re: Call recording (One touch recording)
« Reply #17 on: April 17, 2009, 04:52:28 AM »
Thanks for the update guys, thats great!

Adam
...

Offline PWDasterisk

  • ***
  • 56
  • +0/-0
Re: Call recording (One touch recording)
« Reply #18 on: April 18, 2009, 10:22:13 PM »
Don't ask me how or why - Selintra will have to explain but OTR works for me:

I previously had created an ibay called INTRANET with the following attributes: "Group" => OFFICE (Internal), "User access via file sharing or user ftp" => write=group read=everyone, "Public access via web or anonymous ftp" => Entire Internet (password required outside local network). The full directory path being /home/e-smith/files/ibays/intranet

One day I noticed a folder called "voicemail" had been created. The contents contained all call recordings that had been made by anyone using the *1 code. The filenames were in the format: auto-xxxxxxxxxx-Calling_Number-Called_Number.wav 

Hope that helps.
if at first you don't succeed then keep on reading until you do succeed...

Offline SARK devs

  • *****
  • 2,806
  • +1/-0
    • http://sarkpbx.com
Re: Call recording (One touch recording)
« Reply #19 on: April 19, 2009, 11:12:57 AM »
patience - we're working on it now

:)