Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

sme vs windows sbs

Offline sal1504

  • ****
  • 149
  • +0/-0
sme vs windows sbs
« on: April 24, 2009, 02:22:35 AM »
Are there any side by side comparison charts of sme functions vs windows sbs functions? I was wanting one for my website. If there is where can I find it?  If not would anyone else be interested in a comparison chart?

Sal

Offline cactus

  • *
  • 4,880
  • +3/-0
    • http://www.snetram.nl
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2009, 07:26:01 PM »
If not would anyone else be interested in a comparison chart?
I guess so, to put it prominently on our wiki :-)
Be careful whose advice you buy, but be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than its worth ~ Baz Luhrmann - Everybody's Free (To Wear Sunscreen)

Offline shawnbishop

  • *****
  • 298
  • +0/-0
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2009, 09:23:41 PM »
From my Experience it does everything SBS does except for Calendar sharing..some sort of default integration of groupware functionality...

OpenXchange can be installed and use a outlook connector but I have never got it to work..

Offline Stefano

  • *
  • 10,894
  • +3/-0
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2009, 09:34:18 PM »
From my Experience it does everything SBS does

IMO it does more than SBS.. think about AV & antispam mail filters, http/mail proxy and much more

my 2c

Stefano

Offline sal1504

  • ****
  • 149
  • +0/-0
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2009, 11:55:42 PM »
I will get started on it this weekend. Is there someplace I should email this to have it double check for accuracy?

Sal

Offline pwalter

  • *
  • 38
  • +0/-0
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2009, 07:39:45 AM »
IMO it does more than SBS.. think about AV & antispam mail filters, http/mail proxy and much more

my 2c

Stefano
Well, as regards the OOBE (out-of-the-box-experience), SME has capabilities that SBS doesn't have, and SBS has capabilities that SME doesn't have. A good starting point for a comparison chart is at
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/compare-roles.aspx

Offline mmccarn

  • *
  • 2,656
  • +10/-0
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2009, 05:13:01 PM »
I will get started on it this weekend. Is there someplace I should email this to have it double check for accuracy?

I would think that a wiki page would be the most useful place to put it.

Add {{Needs review}} at the top of your page.

Offline CrayXMP

  • 4
  • +0/-0
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2009, 11:15:44 AM »
Hi all,
If it is of any interest, here are some links regarding SBS 2008 specifically:
"Editions Overview" http://www.microsoft.com/sbs/en/us/editions-overview.aspx
"Compare Features" http://www.microsoft.com/sbs/en/us/compare-features.aspx
... and the obvious upfront price tag;
"Pricing" http://www.microsoft.com/sbs/en/us/pricing.aspx
Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes its laws. (Mayer Amschel Bauer "Rothschild", 1790)

Offline soprom

  • *
  • 589
  • +0/-0
    • www.logiciel-libre.org
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #8 on: May 02, 2009, 01:13:59 AM »
just add cyrus-imap and you match almost all specs!!!
Sophie from Montréal

Offline soprom

  • *
  • 589
  • +0/-0
    • www.logiciel-libre.org
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #9 on: May 02, 2009, 01:49:28 AM »
Feel free to use this for the wiki:

http://drupal.logiciel-libre.org/sbs_sme

Since I never worked with a MS server, I can't tell if it can do all the things I do with SME ( as easily) ...

  • installation
  • ejabberd
  • openvpn
  • affa
  • systemmonitor
  • server-manager (remote)
  • ssh

I guess I'll sound bizarre, but I never reached a point where I was told by a server that I reached the paid limits...


« Last Edit: May 02, 2009, 02:06:53 AM by soprom »
Sophie from Montréal

Offline stephen noble

  • *
  • 607
  • +1/-0
    • Dungog
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #10 on: May 02, 2009, 03:31:40 AM »
A lot of users run SME at home, so we should include MS Home server in the comparison

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/windowshomeserver/default.mspx

Offline soprom

  • *
  • 589
  • +0/-0
    • www.logiciel-libre.org
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #11 on: May 02, 2009, 05:06:53 AM »
Family version brings an interesting thing:

Quote
image-based back up of every home computer every day, so you can restore a single file or an entire PC.

It seams to be, from the look of it, a vault with NAS.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2009, 05:17:49 AM by soprom »
Sophie from Montréal

Offline smeusr

  • ****
  • 74
  • +0/-0
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #12 on: May 23, 2009, 04:00:32 PM »
Has this wiki page been created?  I'm really anxious to see the summarized comparison.

 :P

Offline compdoc

  • *
  • 226
  • +0/-0
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #13 on: May 23, 2009, 06:14:32 PM »
Small Business Server has Exchange, SQL Server, and a few other options depending on the version, and Active Directory. AD creates a 'domain' that users and other servers can join. When they join, they are given rights, and you can control their access to files and services, and allow other servers to trust certain users without a lot of intervention on your part. Exchange is basically a central database of email that can be backed up live, and has other benefits, like the calendaring mentioned above.

I use SME for customers to filter viruses and spam for their Exchange servers, since windows based software to do that is very expensive and doesnt always work that well. I dont need an AD domain for my own office, so I use SME as my email server. Both SBS and SME are great at what they do, and they have a few similar features, but they are very different.
 
Windows Server is very stable. Windows really shines at basic file and print sharing, and it runs easily on any hardware you can think of just because there are drivers for everything. But I would never attach a Windows server directly to the web, so I dont use Windows servers as gateways or firewalls. I install one nic in them and hide them behind a firewall.
 
SME really shines at webserving, virus & spam scanning, firewall, email, (with pop3, imap, and horde) and you can serve files, although I'm not conviced that samba is as good as windows with heavily used database files like MS Access. But do you really want to store your files on your firewall in any case?
 
SBS, and the software to do backups, etc. is very expensive, while SME is priced right. But if you need SBS, cost isnt really an issue...
 
 
 
 

Offline cactus

  • *
  • 4,880
  • +3/-0
    • http://www.snetram.nl
Re: sme vs windows sbs
« Reply #14 on: May 23, 2009, 06:18:29 PM »
although I'm not conviced that samba is as good as windows with heavily used database files like MS Access.
I do not think Access is a good system for a heavily used database... I also wonder what heavily used means in this context. :-)
Be careful whose advice you buy, but be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than its worth ~ Baz Luhrmann - Everybody's Free (To Wear Sunscreen)