Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

Impending change to Snom provisioning

Offline SARK devs

  • *****
  • 2,806
  • +1/-0
    • http://sarkpbx.com
Impending change to Snom provisioning
« on: August 21, 2009, 09:18:14 PM »
Hi all,

We intend to change the way in which we provision snoms.  This will involve, as a minimum, changing the user supplied directories to xml and updating the snom "base" settings in the devices library, perhaps also to xml.  This may affect you if you have your own "standard" settings in the device templates.  We suggest you back up or make a copy of any specific settings you have in preparation for our proposed changes.

Best

S

Offline peterpan746

  • ***
  • 55
  • +0/-0
Re: Impending change to Snom provisioning
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2009, 10:52:31 PM »
Have these changes been implemented yet?

Offline SARK devs

  • *****
  • 2,806
  • +1/-0
    • http://sarkpbx.com
Re: Impending change to Snom provisioning
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2009, 11:27:44 PM »
The XML provisioning, along with the definitions for the new Snom 820 and Snom 870 are all included in 2.2.4 and 2.3.3 of SARK.  These two releases are currently in shake down and will be available in the next week or two.  SARK has already been extensively tested with the 820, the 870 and MeetingPoint. The Snom 870 is simply awesome, the best SIP phone in the world by a long, long way. 

Best

S

Offline peterpan746

  • ***
  • 55
  • +0/-0
Re: Impending change to Snom provisioning
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2009, 08:47:42 PM »
Im not sure if I should start a new thread, but this concerns the auto provisioning for a Snom 320.  I have done what the wiki says, but still can't get the BLF on the Snom to work.  The phone is registered, I can make and receive calls. Yet it is stuborn. Any help on this would be highly appreciated.

Offline SARK devs

  • *****
  • 2,806
  • +1/-0
    • http://sarkpbx.com
Re: Impending change to Snom provisioning
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2009, 09:06:24 PM »
In your last post you mentioned a Snom320 and something called zoiper, which I've just discovered is an IAX softphone...

Is that the phone you are attempting to BLF with your Snom?

BLF works using SIP Notify, I'm not 100% sure but I don't thnk your IAX softphone will work. 

Kind Regards

S



Offline peterpan746

  • ***
  • 55
  • +0/-0
Re: Impending change to Snom provisioning
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2009, 09:09:20 PM »
I switched to a SIP extension now, but still have the same results.

Offline SARK devs

  • *****
  • 2,806
  • +1/-0
    • http://sarkpbx.com
Re: Impending change to Snom provisioning
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2009, 09:52:48 PM »
Then you've set it up wrongly somewhere.  Snom BLF just works.

Only slight ambiguity is that the older Snom firmware used "Destination" in the FKey type drop down.  Later releases use "Extension".   

In sip.conf set...

The BLF mechanism changed in Asterisk 1.4 and you must add these additional parameters to sip.conf...

In the general section (in Headers->sip.conf)

limitonpeers=yes
notifyringing=yes
notifybusy=yes

In the friend section for each phone

call-limit=99
subscribecontext=extensions
insecure=very


That's it

Regards

S

Offline peterpan746

  • ***
  • 55
  • +0/-0
Re: Impending change to Snom provisioning
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2009, 10:08:04 PM »
Hi there,

I finally got it working, was the info that needed to go into the friend context.  Thanks again for the help.

Frik