Topic: Can't join domain after updates

[brick]

Hi,
I updated my system 7.4 to 7.4 (???)
Now I can't join new clients to domain.
I looked it up on the bugtracker and found a closed ticket:
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4829
My problem seems a bit different since the group memberships have not changed.
Is anyone else having such a problem?
Can anyone share some insight?

Code: [Select]

Feb 23 10:34:25 daryus esmith::event[22481]: Processing event: machine-account-create client01$
Feb 23 10:34:25 daryus esmith::event[22481]: Running event handler: /etc/e-smith/events/machine-account-create/S10create-machine-account
Feb 23 10:34:25 daryus esmith::event[22481]: create-machine-account client01$: Creating Unix user and group 
Feb 23 10:34:25 daryus esmith::event[22481]: Insecure $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at /etc/e-smith/events/machine-account-create/S10create-machine-account line 58. 
Feb 23 10:34:25 daryus esmith::event[22481]: S10create-machine-account=action|Event|machine-account-create|Action|S10create-machine-account|Start|1266932065 89316|End|1266932065 293708|Elapsed|0.204392|Status|65280
Feb 23 10:34:25 daryus smbd[22480]: [2010/02/23 10:34:25, 0] passdb/pdb_interface.c:pdb_default_create_user(329)
Feb 23 10:34:25 daryus smbd[22480]:   _samr_create_user: Running the command `/sbin/e-smith/signal-event machine-account-create client01$'' gave 1

[Stefano]

please don't report problems here

open a bug in bugzilla, thank you

[brick]

Thank you Stefano, I'll open a new bug.
I still would like to hear from other users, since the person who opened a bug with the exact same problem 2 years ago never got a satisfactory answer, and it seems to be very common there.

Best Regards,

[Stefano]

I still would like to hear from other users, since the person who opened a bug with the exact same problem 2 years ago never got a satisfactory answer, and it seems to be very common there.

if any other user has/had such a problem the proper place where discuss is bugzilla

about the "very common", could you please explain, as I can't find any evidence of it?

thank you

[CharlieBrady]

about the "very common", could you please explain, as I can't find any evidence of it?

All followup to the bug tracker please.

[CharlieBrady]

I looked it up on the bugtracker and found a closed ticket:
http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4829
My problem seems a bit different ...

So please open a new bug report.

[brick]

To the bugtracker: http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5796

Best Regards,

[brick]

Status:   CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 4829
Now, that was useless...

[Stefano]

if it was closed (I see also NOTABUG) it means that you have the solution there or that it's not a SME's issue

did you follow all the steps?

[brick]

if it was closed (I see also NOTABUG) it means that you have the solution there or that it's not a SME's issue

Right! I have added contribs to the system and therefore it's not an SME issue.
I had SME with all the contribs working BEFORE I apply the updates!

did you follow all the steps?

Which steps?

Best,

[CharlieBrady]

Right! I have added contribs to the system and therefore it's not an SME issue.
I had SME with all the contribs working BEFORE I apply the updates!Which steps?

Best,

The ones in

http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4829

which verify the diagnosis of the problem (comment #8), and the steps in comment #14 for restoring permissions on the web panel scripts.

[brick]

Hi Charlie,
This is the thing, on #8 it returns everything as it should be, unlike the bug 4829 the permissions on the files are correct. And #14 does not resolve the problems, I guess because the permission on the files are correct.

Should I try creating another bug?

Best Regards,

[CharlieBrady]

Should I try creating another bug?

Re-open the bug which was closed as a duplicate, and add your new information as a comment.