Well then, I love my sme boxes that whirr happily while performing like athletes in our little business.
Now time has come to think about a new storage solution (which is still on an old windows machine), and I find myself comparing any offer to a hypothetical selfmade SME 8 box..
So I would like to ask you some advice, to see if my ideal is feasible with SME.
- first, I want to shy away from all proprietary slow-performing NAS implementations. - a new SME server on decent hardware is OK - Check.
- then, I want plenty of storage on a fast raid. - raid 5+1 on hardware or software, SME can do anything - Check.
- I was thinking of a supermicro, something like the
http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/2U/825/SC825TQ-R700U.cfm chassis, or
http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/2U/5025/SYS-5025B-4.cfm (we have only supermicro servers and they seem to perform well)
- I have had my share of failing raids this year, all RAID1 systems which take relative little time to rebuild (200G, 3 to 4 hours) so taking into account that I would try a raid5+1 with 1TB disks (and not the most expensive ones..), what can I expect to be the rebuilt times?
- then, I want my user's outlook (argh) PST files on it. here comes the pain..
- even if some of our users do have their PST files on the server, this slows down outlook a lot,
plus having PST files on network shares is actually not supported... because outlook wants block access to the disk
- so, I thought of making ISCSI targets on the SME server, which seems to be possibile in CentOS4 and 5..
see
http://www.aspdeveloper.net/tiki-index.php?page=LinuxiSCSITargetOnCentOS and
http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2009/04/12/configuring-the-open-iscsi-initiator-on-centos-linux-hosts/ - however this forum question
http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=45856.0 did not receive any attention..
while this forum post
http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=37361.0 is a bit old..
ah, it seems that this is
not possible, as ISCSI is one-to-one, not multiple to one, and not at all with NTFS on it.. which is what I would have wanted.
anyway. I still have to construct this file server.
- next I'd like to integrate it as much as possibile into the domain.. which is a windows 2003 level AD. so samba 3 to the rescue?
- It would be very nice to join the domain, maybe give a file server role to the sme box, and to authenticate against the AD domain controller.. is this at all possibile?
- is there any hope that there could be some form of user ACL/security audit of the files? would I see who has created the file and who accessed it and who modified it, like on NTFS? (don't shoot..)
this will be a test box in the initial phase, so I will be free to experiment with it.. until I put it into production...
well then, thanks for your thoughts. ciao from a sunny Italy,
Michel