Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

Spam filtering

Offline piran

  • *****
  • 502
  • +0/-0
Re: Spam filtering
« Reply #15 on: August 04, 2011, 02:23:21 PM »
yes, IMHO it would be better..
Now done.

Offline CharlieBrady

  • *
  • 6,918
  • +3/-0
Re: Spam filtering
« Reply #16 on: August 04, 2011, 02:59:47 PM »
Understood. Would you and Charlie prefer that I...
PostEdit "implement earlytalker filtering" to
PostEdit "adjust existing earlytalker filtering timeout"?

Yes. And if you think that the earlytalker filter timeout needs to be adjusted to be effective, you should post that in the bug tracker - rather than suggest that one user make a custom change to implement that difference. If you post it in the bug tracker, then perhaps the change can be made so that it will help not one user, but tens of thousands of users.

Offline CharlieBrady

  • *
  • 6,918
  • +3/-0
Re: Spam filtering
« Reply #17 on: August 04, 2011, 03:03:04 PM »
I didn't say it was working incorrectly or in any way
not to expectation or actually needed adjusting in
normal circumstances.

Don't you directly contradict these statements in your Comment #10 (where you mention "the criminals who seem to have taken over Rustock's mantle")?

Offline piran

  • *****
  • 502
  • +0/-0
Re: Spam filtering
« Reply #18 on: August 04, 2011, 03:09:32 PM »

Offline piran

  • *****
  • 502
  • +0/-0
Re: Spam filtering
« Reply #19 on: August 04, 2011, 03:13:39 PM »
And if you think that the earlytalker filter timeout needs to be adjusted to be effective, you should post that in the bug tracker...
No, it is not what I think. Please stop articulating what
you feel I think. The increased timeout setting is for
the singular use by the OP to try to address the
problem articulated in his thread. It is not suitable
for everyone or tens of thousands or for inclusion
in the standard product, that would be inappropriate.

Offline piran

  • *****
  • 502
  • +0/-0
Re: Spam filtering
« Reply #20 on: August 04, 2011, 03:14:52 PM »
Don't you directly contradict these statements in your Comment #10 (where you mention "the criminals who seem to have taken over Rustock's mantle")?
I'm sorry Charlie but I don't understand.

Offline CharlieBrady

  • *
  • 6,918
  • +3/-0
Re: Spam filtering
« Reply #21 on: August 04, 2011, 03:54:12 PM »
No, it is not what I think. Please stop articulating what you feel I think.

I made no assertion of what you think. Please drop your attitude. And please stop being disingenuous.

Quote
The increased timeout setting is for
the singular use by the OP to try to address the
problem articulated in his thread.

What is your evidence that the OP has a problem with inadequate earlytalker timeout setting, and that the same issue does not affect every SME server user?

Offline piran

  • *****
  • 502
  • +0/-0
Re: Spam filtering
« Reply #22 on: August 04, 2011, 04:05:38 PM »
I'm not quoting any more. Read back. You keep saying
what (you feel) I'm thinking. Please stop doing that. I
am entirely sincere and I would reciprocate your request
and ask you to stop being disingenuous. I am attempting
to help the OP.

There is NO 'evidence', please stop this attitude.
I have suggested a course of action for the OP.
I am trying to be helpful to the OP. Please get
off my back unless you can be constructive.
Only you are suggesting that this might be
something affecting everybody else. I'm not.