Again Daniel, thank you so much for the fast repply.
Here is my task, we have multiple offices around the globe, let us take example: one office in UK, one in Australia, one in Alaska and the main office is in Nova scotia (CA). In my testing enviroment i have all the hardware with me all 4 SME servers are installed. I want all these servers to connect to the main office NS as it holds all the data in our datacenter. So i have to create multiple site to site connection from all servers to NS, (of course one daemon to one client) this can be done using the site-to-site in the server manager GUI. This completely I understand as straight thru connection between the servers only as long the user are connected to the same subnet as the sme server. the second part of this task is: the staff in those different location they travel fair a bit for field work and they need the connection to their office for "stuff", what i want to do is to have server to client OpenVPN installed on these server so only the staff in and around their location can connect to their office thru the VPN. I do like the Bridge technologie and the dual security feature, but my manager disagree with me as he prefere using routed VPN instead as he claim it is more secure and doesn't advertise the internal (local) IP address while connecting.
My question to you Daniel:- is this plan good to go, in a way that i would like it to preform?
- Is their something that i don't see regarding the security feature between routed and bridged connection?
- if i go with my plan and use bridged VPN, this means it will be installed on each of these servers, and only the staff of each location will have the Password and Cert of the server where their office belong? is that how it suppose to be.
Thank you so much, hope you have a great holdays