Koozali.org: home of the SME Server

SME server review

Offline jjcuk

  • *
  • 90
  • +0/-0
SME server review
« on: January 06, 2014, 11:56:35 PM »
A review of SME has appeared on the Distrowatch weekly page is anyone is interested

http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20140106
regards
James
Regards
Jim C

Offline stephdl

  • *
  • 1,523
  • +0/-0
    • Linux et Geekeries
Re: SME server review
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2014, 08:19:24 PM »
thanks for sharing :)
See http://wiki.contribs.org/Koozali_Foundation
irc : Freenode #sme_server #sme-fr

!!! Please write your knowledge to the Wiki !!!

Offline janet

  • *****
  • 4,812
  • +0/-0
Re: SME server review
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2014, 10:33:46 PM »
stephdl or whomever

Would an admin with appropriate access rights please add this review link to the main wiki page(s). Thanks
Please search before asking, an answer may already exist.
The Search & other links to useful information are at top of Forum.

Offline stephdl

  • *
  • 1,523
  • +0/-0
    • Linux et Geekeries
Re: SME server review
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2014, 11:01:33 PM »
If nobody see no objection i can do it, i say that if that there are no hide senses in this article against the sme product, sorry french inside
See http://wiki.contribs.org/Koozali_Foundation
irc : Freenode #sme_server #sme-fr

!!! Please write your knowledge to the Wiki !!!

Offline janet

  • *****
  • 4,812
  • +0/-0
Re: SME server review
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2014, 11:14:08 PM »
stephdl

Quote
....i say that if that there are no hide senses in this article against the sme product...

I think you mean "no hidden meanings that are detrimental to sme server".

Whether good or bad, the sme server supporters should accept the verdict of an external assessment, & publish it.

The article seemed positively OK, except for one error where the author said there was no place to configure dynamic (WAN) IPs during the initial setup.
Also I feel there was too much emphasis, time & words spent (wasted in my opinion) on basic setup, where really the functions & features should have been more fully reviewed & reported upon.
Please search before asking, an answer may already exist.
The Search & other links to useful information are at top of Forum.

Offline stephdl

  • *
  • 1,523
  • +0/-0
    • Linux et Geekeries
Re: SME server review
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2014, 11:33:17 PM »
please improve my wording janet, give me back what we should write
http://wiki.contribs.org/Main_Page
See http://wiki.contribs.org/Koozali_Foundation
irc : Freenode #sme_server #sme-fr

!!! Please write your knowledge to the Wiki !!!

Offline janet

  • *****
  • 4,812
  • +0/-0
Re: SME server review
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2014, 12:36:09 AM »
stephdl

What you have written is good, thanks
Please search before asking, an answer may already exist.
The Search & other links to useful information are at top of Forum.