dmac,
Yes it's a rant ... but with some

...and pls note this thread was about
"a client running 6.0"Please don't confuse SME users as to the facts:
WARNING -
the Promise S150 SX4 doesn't work in SME as of 12/2004 - nobody can make it work because of lacking driver/kernel ! - WARNING
It seems to (sort of work) with Feodora and Suse 9.x ...but
i) the SataFaq author is right (definitely!) I doubt even XOR works in Linux...
ii)have you taken any data? In my friends 2.8 Ghz Server even when it (sort of) works it's slower than a Linux software Raid1
and we tested about 10 SDRAM sets before one would work.

(they even need to include a special program for that test! <lol>)
For a few Euros more you can get a 3ware if you want working hardware.
Regards
Reinhold
BTW: I do run/own support about 16 Promise controllers - the "IDE-only"'s are good the rest is "cheap"
########## addition ##########
As I strongly believe in data not rants <eg> ... I had the other proud owner in a chat a few minutes ago... this is some simple data from the friends "fully supported S150 SX4 in Feodora" ...
-----
# hdparm -tT /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Timing cached reads: 660 MB in 2.00 seconds = 330.05 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 48 MB in 3.11 seconds = 15.43 MB/sec
-----
He said he had a measured write rate to the fs of about 7 MB/s ... which is slower that a 100MBit line

----- and this is a software-raid5 (!) 1.8GHz AMD gateway I am sitting at right now
-----
# hdparm -tT /dev/md3
/dev/md3:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.51 seconds =250.98 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.03 seconds = 62.14 MB/sec
---- and that's a drive itself/alone

---
# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.51 seconds =250.98 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.10 seconds = 58.18 MB/sec
Note: The hard disks are of course different and this is a weak hint type test BUT I'd be really interested in your S150 SX FEODORA DISK DATA...
...
@darkgumby Sorry I am starting to hijack your thread here <smile> ...