Stephano: Why SME should not support it out of the box? It support Apple Network (just because it exist and someone use it) it even start it without asking me if i need it... Guess what: ntfs also exist and lots of people use it (and we have no conversion utility that will convert ntfs to ext3 without loosing data).
Also, do you think that installer formating all drives it found, not only the one on which i choose to install it - is OK too?
Cactus: I found some questions about ntfs on this forum back in 2005.... I ask in forum because if am the only one that i need it then will be no point to raise a bug. I used windows so i have drives with ntfs... looks like i will switch back to it...
Well, i`ve "google it" and found some RPM-s (on
www.tuxera.com for RH el4) which i`ve download and install with "yum localinstall":
[root@mainframe ~]# uname -a
Linux mainframe 2.6.9-89.0.16.EL #1 Tue Nov 3 17:15:02 EST 2009 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
yum info:
Installed Packages
Name : ntfs-3g
Arch : i686
Version: 2009.4.4
Release: EL4
Size : 365 k
Repo : installed
Summary: Linux NTFS userspace driver
Installed Packages
Name : fuse
Arch : i686
Version: 2.6.3
Release: 3.EL4
Size : 207 k
Repo : installed
Summary: File System in Userspace (FUSE) utilities
[root@mainframe ~]# mount -t ntfs-3g -o inherit /dev/sda1 /mnt/disk1
FATAL: Module fuse not found.
ntfs-3g-mount: fuse device is missing, try 'modprobe fuse' as root
[root@mainframe ~]# modprobe fuse
FATAL: Module fuse not found.
Why the original kernel was not compiled with ntfs support?
[root@mainframe ~]# mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/disk1
mount: fs type ntfs not supported by kernel
[root@mainframe ~]#
PS: I use SME at work because it was easy to install and manage and have a big community with lots of "contribs", but for home server i`ll stick to windows, because of narrow minded people who think it`s ok for me with my limited linux knowledge to struggle to implement something this minor that they consider not worth for working out of the box.
Thank you.